Full Text
Translation output
72# $~ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 771/2011
PARDEEP CHADHA Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vikas Bhatia, Advocate with Petitioner in person.
W.P.(CRL) 771/2011
PARDEEP CHADHA Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vikas Bhatia, Advocate with Petitioner in person.
VERSUS
STATE & ANR Respondents
Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel with Mr. Laxmi Chauhan, Advocate with J.K. Prasad, PS Paschim Vihar.
Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel with Mr. Laxmi Chauhan, Advocate with J.K. Prasad, PS Paschim Vihar.
Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
I % 26.05.2011 Cri.
M.A. No. 6360/2011 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P. (CrU No. 771/2011 By this petition the Petitionerwho is the brotherin law of Respondent
No. 2 seeks quashing of FIR No. 46/2005 under Sections 498A/406/506/34
IPG registered at PS Paschim Vihar, Delhi.
The husband of the Respondent No. 2 had expired on 23''^ October, 2009 thus the Petitioner is now the only accused in the abovementioned ITR.
The Complainant/ Respondent No. 2 Ms. Preeti Chadha is prescjnt in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that she has settled the matter
I % 26.05.2011 Cri.
M.A. No. 6360/2011 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P. (CrU No. 771/2011 By this petition the Petitionerwho is the brotherin law of Respondent
No. 2 seeks quashing of FIR No. 46/2005 under Sections 498A/406/506/34
IPG registered at PS Paschim Vihar, Delhi.
The husband of the Respondent No. 2 had expired on 23''^ October, 2009 thus the Petitioner is now the only accused in the abovementioned ITR.
The Complainant/ Respondent No. 2 Ms. Preeti Chadha is prescjnt in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that she has settled the matter
W.R(CRL) 771/2011
2011:DHC:17935 and in terms of the settlement she has left with no claimstowards the family of the husband including the present Petitioner. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useftil purpose will be sei-ved in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings
^ pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 46/2005 under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPG registered at PS Paschim Vihar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. j ^ MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MAY 26. 2011/'vvi'
2011:DHC:17935 and in terms of the settlement she has left with no claimstowards the family of the husband including the present Petitioner. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useftil purpose will be sei-ved in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings
^ pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 46/2005 under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPG registered at PS Paschim Vihar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. j ^ MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MAY 26. 2011/'vvi'
W.R(CRL) 771/2011 Page 2 of2
2011:DHC:17935
2011:DHC:17935
JUDGMENT