Full Text
Translation output
% 01.06.2011
Present: Mr. Suresh Chandra, Adv. for the petitioners.
Mr. M.P. Singh, AFP for the State with SI Dinesh Prasad, P.S. Subzi Mandi.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 1898/2011
•k
Petitioner Nos. 1 and 5 were married in the year 1988.
Matrimonial discord between them had led to registration of the present FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPG on the complaint of petitioner No. 5. Petitioner Nos. 1 and 5 have settled their disputes before the Lok Adalat on 6^^ July, 2008. Pursuant to the settlement, they have even obtained a decree of divorce by mutual consent from the court of Additional District Judge, Delhi on 20^^
April, 2009. Petitioner No. 5, who is present in Court today and has been identified by the Investigating Officer, admits that she has already received ^60,000/- and she has no objection in case FIR in question is quashed.
Keeping in mind that husband and wife have settled their disputes amicably and have decided to start their life afresh, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the present criminal proceedings pending. Accordingly, in the larger interest, FIR NO. 494/1997 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police
2011:DHC:12523
V. station Subzi Mandi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
June 01, 2011 rb
A.K. PATHAK, J.
2011:DHC:12523
Present: Mr. Suresh Chandra, Adv. for the petitioners.
Mr. M.P. Singh, AFP for the State with SI Dinesh Prasad, P.S. Subzi Mandi.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 1898/2011
•k
Petitioner Nos. 1 and 5 were married in the year 1988.
Matrimonial discord between them had led to registration of the present FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPG on the complaint of petitioner No. 5. Petitioner Nos. 1 and 5 have settled their disputes before the Lok Adalat on 6^^ July, 2008. Pursuant to the settlement, they have even obtained a decree of divorce by mutual consent from the court of Additional District Judge, Delhi on 20^^
April, 2009. Petitioner No. 5, who is present in Court today and has been identified by the Investigating Officer, admits that she has already received ^60,000/- and she has no objection in case FIR in question is quashed.
Keeping in mind that husband and wife have settled their disputes amicably and have decided to start their life afresh, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the present criminal proceedings pending. Accordingly, in the larger interest, FIR NO. 494/1997 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police
2011:DHC:12523
V. station Subzi Mandi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
June 01, 2011 rb
A.K. PATHAK, J.
2011:DHC:12523
JUDGMENT