Full Text
Translation output
% 01.06.2011
Present: Mr. Devender Dagar and Mr. R.P. Nafria, Advs. for the petitioners with petitioners in person.
Mr. Arvind Gupta, APP for the State.
Respondent No. 2 in person.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 1628/2011
-k
Petitioners are working as Teachers in Government Boys
School. Respondent No. 2 is also a Teacher. On the fateful day, respondent No. 2 was going with her husband on his motor cycle.
Her husband stopped motor cycle to attend a telephone call.
Petitioners were passing through the same area in a Maruti car.
They were in inebriated condition; they misbehaved with respondent no. 2, inasmuch as they tried to pull her in their car.
This incident had led to the registration of present FIR on the complaint of respondent no. 2. With the intervention of common friends and other respectable persons of the locality, petitioners and respondent no. 2 have settled their disputes amicably. Respondent
No. 2, who is present in Court today, has no objection in case FIR in question is quashed.
Keeping in mind the fact that parties have settled their disputes and respondent no. 2 is not willing to pursue her complaint
2011:DHC:12360 any further, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the present criminal proceedings pending. Accordingly, in the larger interest, FIR No. 276/2010 under Sections 354/365/511/34 IPG registered at Police Station Hazarat Nizamuddin and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed, subject to, however, cost of ^10,000/- each imposed upon the petitioners which shall be deposited with the Lawyer's Welfare Fund within one week. Receipts evidencing deposit of cost shall be filed in the Registry.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
^
A.K. PATHAK, J.
June 01, 2011 rb
2011:DHC:12360
Present: Mr. Devender Dagar and Mr. R.P. Nafria, Advs. for the petitioners with petitioners in person.
Mr. Arvind Gupta, APP for the State.
Respondent No. 2 in person.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 1628/2011
-k
Petitioners are working as Teachers in Government Boys
School. Respondent No. 2 is also a Teacher. On the fateful day, respondent No. 2 was going with her husband on his motor cycle.
Her husband stopped motor cycle to attend a telephone call.
Petitioners were passing through the same area in a Maruti car.
They were in inebriated condition; they misbehaved with respondent no. 2, inasmuch as they tried to pull her in their car.
This incident had led to the registration of present FIR on the complaint of respondent no. 2. With the intervention of common friends and other respectable persons of the locality, petitioners and respondent no. 2 have settled their disputes amicably. Respondent
No. 2, who is present in Court today, has no objection in case FIR in question is quashed.
Keeping in mind the fact that parties have settled their disputes and respondent no. 2 is not willing to pursue her complaint
2011:DHC:12360 any further, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the present criminal proceedings pending. Accordingly, in the larger interest, FIR No. 276/2010 under Sections 354/365/511/34 IPG registered at Police Station Hazarat Nizamuddin and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed, subject to, however, cost of ^10,000/- each imposed upon the petitioners which shall be deposited with the Lawyer's Welfare Fund within one week. Receipts evidencing deposit of cost shall be filed in the Registry.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
^
A.K. PATHAK, J.
June 01, 2011 rb
2011:DHC:12360
JUDGMENT