Full Text
Translation output
$-3 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 1489/2011
RAMESH VERMA @JALIM VERMA Petitioner
Through' Mr. C.Rajaram & Mr. B. Anand, Advs. With petitioner in person.
CRL.M.C. 1489/2011
RAMESH VERMA @JALIM VERMA Petitioner
Through' Mr. C.Rajaram & Mr. B. Anand, Advs. With petitioner in person.
VERSUS
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Respondents
Through Mr. Pawan Bahl, APP for State with Mr. Tribhuvan Negi, SI, PS Moti Ngr.
R-2 in person.
Through Mr. Pawan Bahl, APP for State with Mr. Tribhuvan Negi, SI, PS Moti Ngr.
R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
0L06.2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 439/2003 under Section 363 IPG registered at PS Moti Nagar, Delhi on the complaint ofRespondent No.2.
The Respondent No.2 alleged that his daughter Sunita has been kidnapped by the present Petitioner. The Respondent No.2 is present in
Court and he states that subsequent to the registration of FIR he came to know that his daughter has willingly gone with the Petitioner and she had married him. The complainant's daughter and the Petitioner are leading a
CRL.M.C. 1489/2011
2011:DHC:12348 r 5 happy married life since then and are blessed with two children from the said wedlock. He states that he does not want to pursue the above mentioned FIR which was registered because he was not aware ofthe true facts. Since the parties have amicably settled the matter, the Respondent No.2 does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be appropriate to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 439/2003 under Section 363 IPG registered at
PS Moti Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties i.e. the Petitioner, Smt. Sunita and Respondent No.2 who are identified by their respective counsel and Investigating Officer have signed this ordersheet in acknowledgment of their statements beforethis Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
JUNE 01,2011 5^' Q
0L06.2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 439/2003 under Section 363 IPG registered at PS Moti Nagar, Delhi on the complaint ofRespondent No.2.
The Respondent No.2 alleged that his daughter Sunita has been kidnapped by the present Petitioner. The Respondent No.2 is present in
Court and he states that subsequent to the registration of FIR he came to know that his daughter has willingly gone with the Petitioner and she had married him. The complainant's daughter and the Petitioner are leading a
CRL.M.C. 1489/2011
2011:DHC:12348 r 5 happy married life since then and are blessed with two children from the said wedlock. He states that he does not want to pursue the above mentioned FIR which was registered because he was not aware ofthe true facts. Since the parties have amicably settled the matter, the Respondent No.2 does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be appropriate to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 439/2003 under Section 363 IPG registered at
PS Moti Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties i.e. the Petitioner, Smt. Sunita and Respondent No.2 who are identified by their respective counsel and Investigating Officer have signed this ordersheet in acknowledgment of their statements beforethis Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
JUNE 01,2011 5^' Q
CRLM. C. 1489/2011
(^?bkuv«, (Jc..
MUKTA GUPTA,J 2011:DHC:12348
(^?bkuv«, (Jc..
MUKTA GUPTA,J 2011:DHC:12348
JUDGMENT