Full Text
Translation output
#4
%01.06.2011
Present: Petitioners in person with Ms. Upma Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners who identifies them.
Ms. Santosh Kohli, APP for the State/respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2 in person, who is identified by 10 51 Vasant
Kumar, P.S. Tilak Nagar.
+ Cri.M.C. No.892/2011
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the FIR
No.769/2000 under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC P.S. Tilak Nagar registered on the complaint of respondent No.2.
Ground for seeking quashing is that the FIR is the result of matrimonial discord which has been amicably settled and now there is no dispute left between them.
Petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 confirm that they have amicably settled the matter and now they are happily living together for the last more than one year.
Respondent No.2 submits that she has amicably settled the matter with petitioner No.1 of her own accord, without any inducement or threat from any corner. She submits that she has been living happily with her husband at her matrimonial house and now there is no dispute left between her and the petitioners. Thus, she does not want the petitioners to be prosecuted on her complaint and she has no objection if the FIR is quashed.
2011:DHC:12308
Learned Ms. Santosh Kohli, APP appearing on behalf of the State submits that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, State has no objection if the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Since the parties have amicably settled the matter, I feel that no useful purpose shall be served in keeping the FIR and the proceedings arising out of
• the same alive. Accordingly, in the interest of amicable and harmonious matrimonial life of the petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2, the FIR
No.769/2000 under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC P.S. Tilak Nagar and the proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed.
Petition stands disposed of.
~
(AJIT BHARIHOKE)
JUDGE
JUNE 01, 2011 pst
2011:DHC:12308
%01.06.2011
Present: Petitioners in person with Ms. Upma Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners who identifies them.
Ms. Santosh Kohli, APP for the State/respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2 in person, who is identified by 10 51 Vasant
Kumar, P.S. Tilak Nagar.
+ Cri.M.C. No.892/2011
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the FIR
No.769/2000 under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC P.S. Tilak Nagar registered on the complaint of respondent No.2.
Ground for seeking quashing is that the FIR is the result of matrimonial discord which has been amicably settled and now there is no dispute left between them.
Petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 confirm that they have amicably settled the matter and now they are happily living together for the last more than one year.
Respondent No.2 submits that she has amicably settled the matter with petitioner No.1 of her own accord, without any inducement or threat from any corner. She submits that she has been living happily with her husband at her matrimonial house and now there is no dispute left between her and the petitioners. Thus, she does not want the petitioners to be prosecuted on her complaint and she has no objection if the FIR is quashed.
2011:DHC:12308
Learned Ms. Santosh Kohli, APP appearing on behalf of the State submits that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, State has no objection if the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Since the parties have amicably settled the matter, I feel that no useful purpose shall be served in keeping the FIR and the proceedings arising out of
• the same alive. Accordingly, in the interest of amicable and harmonious matrimonial life of the petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2, the FIR
No.769/2000 under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC P.S. Tilak Nagar and the proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed.
Petition stands disposed of.
~
(AJIT BHARIHOKE)
JUDGE
JUNE 01, 2011 pst
2011:DHC:12308
JUDGMENT