Full Text
Translation output
$-24-33, 35-39, 67-71 HIGH COURT OF DELHI -I- LA.APP.24/2009
RAJ SINGH & ORS.
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
RAJ SINGH & ORS.
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
LA.APP.25/2009
CHOTU & ANR.
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
CHOTU & ANR.
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
LA.APP.34/2009
SHRI BRAHMA
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
Appellant
SHRI BRAHMA
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
Appellant
VERSUS
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndranI Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellants
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndranI Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellants
VERSUS
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndranI Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellant
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndranI Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellant
VERSUS
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndranI Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Page 1 of8 2011:DHC:12772 l_A.APP.36/2009 RISHI RAJ RANA& ANR.
Through:
Appellants
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndranI Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Page 1 of8 2011:DHC:12772 l_A.APP.36/2009 RISHI RAJ RANA& ANR.
Through:
Appellants
VERSUS
UOI & ANR. Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP.47/2009
M.P.GUPTA
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
M.P.GUPTA
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
LA.APP.48/2009
RAGHUBIR SINGH
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
Appellant
RAGHUBIR SINGH
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
Appellant
VERSUS
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellant
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellant
VERSUS
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP.55/2009
BHULLAN @ BHULE & ANR.
Through:
Appellants Page 2 of8 2011:DHC:12772 UOI & ANR.
Through:
BHULLAN @ BHULE & ANR.
Through:
Appellants Page 2 of8 2011:DHC:12772 UOI & ANR.
Through:
LA.APP.56/2009
M.P.GUPTA & SONS
Through:
M.P.GUPTA & SONS
Through:
VERSUS
UOI & ORS.
Through:
Through:
VERSUS
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndranI Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
.Appellants Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndranI Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndranI Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
.Appellants Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndranI Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP.57/2009
MEHAR SINGH & ORS.
Through:
.Appellants
MEHAR SINGH & ORS.
Through:
.Appellants
VERSUS
UOI & ORS.
Through:
Through:
LA.APP.58/2009
SANJEEV TUSHIR
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndranI Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
.Appellants Page 3 of8 2011:DHC:12772
SANJEEV TUSHIR
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndranI Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
.Appellants Page 3 of8 2011:DHC:12772
VERSUS
UOI & ORS.
Through:
Through:
LA.APP.127/2009
JAI NARAYAN & ORS
Through:
JAI NARAYAN & ORS
Through:
VERSUS
UOI & ANR.
Through:
Through:
LA.APP.85/2009
LAKH I RAM
Through:
LAKH I RAM
Through:
VERSUS
UOI & ANR.
Through:
Through:
LA.APP.78/2009
GURDEV SINGH
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
.Appellants Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
.Appellant Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
.Appellant Page 4 of8 2011:DHC:12772
GURDEV SINGH
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
.Appellants Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
.Appellant Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
.Appellant Page 4 of8 2011:DHC:12772
VERSUS
UOI & ORS.
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Rannesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Rannesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP.77/2009
RAJ SINGH (D) THRU LRS
Through:
.Appellants
RAJ SINGH (D) THRU LRS
Through:
.Appellants
VERSUS
UOI & ORS.
Through:
Through:
LA.APP.76/2009
NISHA GUPTA
Through:
NISHA GUPTA
Through:
VERSUS
UOI & ORS.
Through:
Through:
LA.APP.340/2010
RATTAN SINGH
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
.Appellant Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Rannesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellant Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
Page 5 of8 2011:DHC:12772
RATTAN SINGH
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
.Appellant Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Rannesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellant Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
Page 5 of8 2011:DHC:12772
VERSUS
UOI & ORS. Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
I_A.APP.341/2010 CHARAN SINGH & ORS. Appellants
Through: Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
UOI & ORS.
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
I_A.APP.341/2010 CHARAN SINGH & ORS. Appellants
Through: Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
UOI & ORS.
VERSUS
Respondents
Through; Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Through; Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP.342/2010
RAGHUBIR SINGH
Through:
Appellant Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
UOI & ORS.
RAGHUBIR SINGH
Through:
Appellant Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
UOI & ORS.
VERSUS
Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
I_A.APP.343/2010 ANGOORI & ORS.
Through:
Appellants Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
Page 6 of8 2011:DHC:12772
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
I_A.APP.343/2010 ANGOORI & ORS.
Through:
Appellants Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
Page 6 of8 2011:DHC:12772
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for PDA. l_A.APP.344/2010
HEM CHANDER SHARMA DECD.
THR LRs Appellant
Through: Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for PDA. l_A.APP.344/2010
HEM CHANDER SHARMA DECD.
THR LRs Appellant
Through: Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
VERSUS
UOI & ORS. Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for PDA.
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for PDA.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
02.06.2011
02.06.2011
ORDER
1. The instant appeals pertain to lands situated in the revenue estate of village Ghevra, and the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 with which I am concerned was issued on 6.2.2003.
2. The Reference Court has assessed the compensation @ n,18,367/- besides other statutory benefits as per the Land Acquisition Act 1894.
3. Deciding a batch of appeals lead matter being LA.APP Page 7 of[8] 2011:DHC:12772 No.489/2008 Chiranii La! Vs. UO! & Ann today itself, with reference to a decision dated 19.12.2008 passed by a Division Bench deciding LA.APP.No.193/2006 Pratao Sinoh (through LRs) Vs. UO! & Ors. I have determined the fair market value of the lands in village Ghevra at ^4,03,425/- per bigha as of 6.2.2003.
4. The appeals stand disposed of decreeing the same enhancing the compensation payabie to the appeliants @?4,03,425/- per bigha; additionaily decreed that the appellants would be entitled to the statutory benefits as per the Land Acquisition Act 1894 inciuding the decision of the Supreme Court reported as 93 (2001) DLT 569 Sunder Vs. Union ofIndia.
5. The appeilants wouid aiso be entitied to proportionate costs.
6. Pending appiications, if any, in the appeals stand disposed of in terms ofthe prayer made in the appiication.