Full Text
Translation output
J
$-24-33,35-39,67-71 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
LA.APP.24/2009
RAJ SINGH & ORS.
Through:
Appellant UOI & ANR.
Through:
$-24-33,35-39,67-71 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
LA.APP.24/2009
RAJ SINGH & ORS.
Through:
Appellant UOI & ANR.
Through:
LA.APP.25/2009
CHOTU & ANR.
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
CHOTU & ANR.
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
LA.APP.34/2009
SHRI BRAHMA
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
SHRI BRAHMA
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
VERSUS
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellants
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellants
VERSUS
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellant
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellant
VERSUS
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Page 1 of8 2011:DHC:12621
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Page 1 of8 2011:DHC:12621
LA.APP.36/2009
RISHI RAJ RANA & ANR.
Through:
Appellants UOI & ANR.
Through:
RISHI RAJ RANA & ANR.
Through:
Appellants UOI & ANR.
Through:
LA.APP.47/2009
M.P.GUPTA
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
M.P.GUPTA
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
LA.APP.48/2009
RAGHUBIR SINGH
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
RAGHUBIR SINGH
Through:
UOI & ANR.
Through:
LA.APP.55/2009
VERSUS
, Respondents
Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar,Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellant
Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar,Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellant
VERSUS
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellant
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellant
VERSUS
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
BHULLAN @ BHULE & ANR.
Through:
Appellants Page2of8 2011:DHC:12621
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
BHULLAN @ BHULE & ANR.
Through:
Appellants Page2of8 2011:DHC:12621
VERSUS
UOI&ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar,Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar,Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP.56/2009
M.P.GUPTA & SONS
Through:
.Appellants
M.P.GUPTA & SONS
Through:
.Appellants
VERSUS
UOI & ORS.
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar,Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar,Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP.57/2009
MEHAR SiNGH & ORS.
Through:
.Appellants
MEHAR SiNGH & ORS.
Through:
.Appellants
VERSUS
UOI & ORS.
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar,Advocate for UOi.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar,Advocate for UOi.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP.58/2009
SANJEEV TUSHIR
Through:
.Appeliants Page3of8 2011:DHC:12621
SANJEEV TUSHIR
Through:
.Appeliants Page3of8 2011:DHC:12621
VERSUS
UOI & ORS.
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar,Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar,Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP.127/2009
JAI NARAYAN & ORS
Through:
.Appellants
JAI NARAYAN & ORS
Through:
.Appellants
VERSUS
UOI & ANR. Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP.85/2009
LAKHI RAM
Through:
.Appellant u,
LAKHI RAM
Through:
.Appellant u,
VERSUS
UOI & ANR.
Through:
Through:
LA.APP.78/2009
GURDEV SINGH
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
.Appellant Page4of8 2011:DHC:12621
GURDEV SINGH
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
.Appellant Page4of8 2011:DHC:12621
VERSUS
UOI & ORS.
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar,Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar,Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP.77/2009
RAJ SINGH(D)THRU LRS
Through:
.Appellants
RAJ SINGH(D)THRU LRS
Through:
.Appellants
VERSUS
UOI & ORS.
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP.76/2009
NISHA GUPTA
Through:
.Appellant
NISHA GUPTA
Through:
.Appellant
VERSUS
UOI & ORS.
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Through:
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP.340/2010
RATTAN SINGH
Through:
Appellant Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
Page5of8 2011:DHC:12621 UOI & ORS.
RATTAN SINGH
Through:
Appellant Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
Page5of8 2011:DHC:12621 UOI & ORS.
VERSUS
I
Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
1_A.APP.341/2010 CHARAN SINGH & ORS. Appellants
Through: Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
UOI & ORS.
Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
1_A.APP.341/2010 CHARAN SINGH & ORS. Appellants
Through: Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
UOI & ORS.
VERSUS
Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and , Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and , Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP.342/2010
RAGHUBIR SINGH
Through:
Appellant Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
UOI & ORS.
RAGHUBIR SINGH
Through:
Appellant Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
UOI & ORS.
VERSUS
Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar,Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar,Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA.
LA.APP.343/2010
ANGOORI & ORS.
Through:
Appellants Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
Page6of8 2011:DHC:12621
ANGOORI & ORS.
Through:
Appellants Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
Page6of8 2011:DHC:12621
VERSUS
, UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents '
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for PDA.
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI, Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna
Takiar, Advocate for PDA.
LA.APP.344/2010
I
HEM CHANDER SHARMA DECD.
THR LRs Appellant
Through: Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate, UOI & ORS.
I
HEM CHANDER SHARMA DECD.
THR LRs Appellant
Through: Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate, UOI & ORS.
VERSUS
Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for PDA.
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar,Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray,Advocate and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI.
Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for PDA.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
02.06.2011
02.06.2011
ORDER
1. The instant appeals pertain to lands situated in the revenue estate of village Ghevra, and the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 with which I am concerned was issued on 6.2.2003.
2. The Reference Court has assessed the compensation @ n,18,367/- besides other statutory benefits as per the Land Acquisition Act 1894.
3. Deciding a batch of appeals lead matter being LA.APP Pagre 7of[8] 2011:DHC:12621 No.489/2008 Chiranii La! Vs. UP! & Ann today itself, with I reference to a decision dated 19.12.2008 passed by a Division Bench deciding LA.APP.No.193/2006 Pratao Singh (through LRs) 1/5. UP!& Ors. I have determined the fair market value of the lands in viliage Ghevra at^4,03,425/- per bigha as of[6].2.2003.
4. The appeals stand disposed of decreeing the same enhancing the compensation payable to the appellants @^4,03,425/- per bigha; additionally decreed that the appellants would be entitled to the statutory benefits as per the Land Acquisition Act 1894 including the decision of the Supreme Court reported as 93(2001)DLT569 Sunder Vs. Union ofIndia.
5. The appellants would also be entitled to proportionate costs.
6. Pending applications, if any, in the appeals stand disposed of in terms ofthe prayer made in the application.