Full Text
Translation output
% 02.06.2011
Present: Ms. Seema Gulati and Mr. Sugam Puri, Advs. for the petitioners.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State along with SI
Sanjeev Kumar, P.S. C.P.
Mr. Shishir Mathur, Adv. for respondent no. 2 along with respondent no. 2 in person.
Crl.
M.A. No. 6825/2011
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions
^ Application stands disposed of.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 1912/2011
*
Petitioner no. 1 was employee of respondent no. 2 at the relevant time. On the complaint of respondent no. 2, FIR in question under Sections 419/420/467/468/471 IPG was registered against the petitioners at Police Station Connaught
Place. It was alleged in the FIR that petitioner no. 1 manipulated the cheques of respondent no.2 by forging the signatures of
Managing Director and had transferred a sum of ^"12 lakhs in the account of petitioner no. 2. Now, respondent no.2 and petitioners have settled their disputes amicably. Terms of settlement have been recorded in Memorandum of
Understanding dated 30th May, 2011. Parties shall remain bound by the terms of the settlement. Respondent no.2, who is present in Court today, has no objection in case the FIR is quashed.
2011:DHC:11218
In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, in the larger interest, FIR No. 268/1993 under Sections
419/420/467/468/471 IPG registered at Police Station
Connaught Place and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
June 02, 2011 ga
2011:DHC:11218
Present: Ms. Seema Gulati and Mr. Sugam Puri, Advs. for the petitioners.
Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State along with SI
Sanjeev Kumar, P.S. C.P.
Mr. Shishir Mathur, Adv. for respondent no. 2 along with respondent no. 2 in person.
Crl.
M.A. No. 6825/2011
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions
^ Application stands disposed of.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 1912/2011
*
Petitioner no. 1 was employee of respondent no. 2 at the relevant time. On the complaint of respondent no. 2, FIR in question under Sections 419/420/467/468/471 IPG was registered against the petitioners at Police Station Connaught
Place. It was alleged in the FIR that petitioner no. 1 manipulated the cheques of respondent no.2 by forging the signatures of
Managing Director and had transferred a sum of ^"12 lakhs in the account of petitioner no. 2. Now, respondent no.2 and petitioners have settled their disputes amicably. Terms of settlement have been recorded in Memorandum of
Understanding dated 30th May, 2011. Parties shall remain bound by the terms of the settlement. Respondent no.2, who is present in Court today, has no objection in case the FIR is quashed.
2011:DHC:11218
In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, in the larger interest, FIR No. 268/1993 under Sections
419/420/467/468/471 IPG registered at Police Station
Connaught Place and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
June 02, 2011 ga
2011:DHC:11218
JUDGMENT