Full Text
Translation output
\-_.........
% 03.06.2011
Present: Mr. Anjum Kumar, Adv. for the petitioners.
Mr. U.L. Watwani, APP for the State with SI Ina Kumari, P.S. Shalimar Bagh.
Respondent No.2 in person.
Crl.
M.A. No. 7008/2011 (exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 1972/2011
*
Petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 were married on 13th November, 2000. Marital discord between husband and wife had led to the registration of present FIR under Sections 498-A/406f 34
IPC at Police Station Shalimar Bagh on 1st June, 2004. Petitioner
Nos. 2 and 3 are parents of petitioner No. 1. Now, parties have settled their disputes amicably before the Mediation Cell, Rohini
Courts, Delhi on 15th February, 2011. Terms of settlement have been recorded in the proceeding sheets of the Mediator as
'Annexure B' (at pages 21 to 23). Parties shall remain bound by the terms of settlement. In terms of settlement, petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 have withdrawn the cases filed by them against each other. Respondent No. 2, who is present in Court and
--'-~'
2011:DHC:11354 y~ "._-._, ·'1// identified by the Investigating Officer, states that she has no objection in case FIR in question is quashed.
Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the parties, inasmuch as, the marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent
No. 2 stands dissolved by a decree of divorce, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the criminal proceedings pending. In the larger interest, FIR No. 450/2004 under Sections 498-
A/406I 34 IPC registered at Police Station Shalimar Bagh and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Dasti.
June 03, 2011 rb bvv ----
A.K. PATHAK, J. ,---;---------;--7-:
2011:DHC:11354
Present: Mr. Anjum Kumar, Adv. for the petitioners.
Mr. U.L. Watwani, APP for the State with SI Ina Kumari, P.S. Shalimar Bagh.
Respondent No.2 in person.
Crl.
M.A. No. 7008/2011 (exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 1972/2011
*
Petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 were married on 13th November, 2000. Marital discord between husband and wife had led to the registration of present FIR under Sections 498-A/406f 34
IPC at Police Station Shalimar Bagh on 1st June, 2004. Petitioner
Nos. 2 and 3 are parents of petitioner No. 1. Now, parties have settled their disputes amicably before the Mediation Cell, Rohini
Courts, Delhi on 15th February, 2011. Terms of settlement have been recorded in the proceeding sheets of the Mediator as
'Annexure B' (at pages 21 to 23). Parties shall remain bound by the terms of settlement. In terms of settlement, petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 have withdrawn the cases filed by them against each other. Respondent No. 2, who is present in Court and
--'-~'
2011:DHC:11354 y~ "._-._, ·'1// identified by the Investigating Officer, states that she has no objection in case FIR in question is quashed.
Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the parties, inasmuch as, the marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent
No. 2 stands dissolved by a decree of divorce, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the criminal proceedings pending. In the larger interest, FIR No. 450/2004 under Sections 498-
A/406I 34 IPC registered at Police Station Shalimar Bagh and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Dasti.
June 03, 2011 rb bvv ----
A.K. PATHAK, J. ,---;---------;--7-:
2011:DHC:11354
JUDGMENT