Full Text
Translation output
% 03.06.2011
Present: Mr. Ruchir Batra, Adv. for the petitioners.
Mr. Praveen Pahuja, Adv. for the respondent.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 1622/2011
*
Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 have been arrayed as accused Nos. 3 and
5 before the Trial Court in the complaint filed by the respondent under
^ Section 138 ofthe Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the complaint case was taken up by the Trial Court on 2^'^ June, 2011, when respondent has made a statement that he is not willing to pursue his complaint against the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 (accused Nos. 3 and 5), consequently. Trial Court has dropped the proceedings qua them.
In view of this statement of counsel for the respondent, present petition has become infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
Crl.
M.A. No. 5955/2011 (stay)
Disposed of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
June 03, 2011 rb
2011:DHC:11296
Present: Mr. Ruchir Batra, Adv. for the petitioners.
Mr. Praveen Pahuja, Adv. for the respondent.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 1622/2011
*
Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 have been arrayed as accused Nos. 3 and
5 before the Trial Court in the complaint filed by the respondent under
^ Section 138 ofthe Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the complaint case was taken up by the Trial Court on 2^'^ June, 2011, when respondent has made a statement that he is not willing to pursue his complaint against the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 (accused Nos. 3 and 5), consequently. Trial Court has dropped the proceedings qua them.
In view of this statement of counsel for the respondent, present petition has become infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
Crl.
M.A. No. 5955/2011 (stay)
Disposed of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
June 03, 2011 rb
2011:DHC:11296
JUDGMENT