600fa81099dd7095c214b4857045e2b0232bd996d5c1f503d4351fc6420dc64b

Delhi High Court · 03 Jun 2011 · 2011:DHC:11255
A.K. Pathak
Crl. M.C. No. 1621/2011
2011:DHC:11255
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The court dismissed the petition as infructuous after the complainant withdrew the complaint against the petitioners under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Full Text
Translation output
s
% 03.06.20LL
Present: Mr. Ruchir Batra, Adv. for the petitioners.
Mr. Praveen Pahuja, Adv. for the respondent.
+ Crl. M.C. No. 1621l2O11 tr
Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 }rave been arrayed as accused Nos. 3 and
5 before the Trial Court in the complaint filed by the respondent under i Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the complaint case was taken up by the Trial Court on 2'd June, 2OIL, when respondent has made a statement that he is not willing to pursue his complaint against the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 (accused Nos. 3 and 5), consequently, Trial Court has dropped the proceedings qua them.
In view of this statement of counsel for the respondent, present petition has become infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
+ Crl.
M.A. No. 5953/2O11 (stayl
Disposed of as infructuous.
June 03, 2011 rb
?
A.K. PATHAK, J.
2011:DHC:11255
JUDGMENT