Full Text
Translation output
$-102 HIGH COURT OF DELHI ludament Reserved On: lune. 2011 ludament Delivered On: 7^" tune. 2011
LA.APP. 204/2009
VIKASH @ YOGESH TYAGI AND ANR. Appellant
Through: Mr.J.N.S.Tyagi and Mr.S.P.Tyagi, Advocates
LA.APP. 204/2009
VIKASH @ YOGESH TYAGI AND ANR. Appellant
Through: Mr.J.N.S.Tyagi and Mr.S.P.Tyagi, Advocates
VERSUS
UOI AND ORS. Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Standing Counsel (LA), GNCT Delhi with Mr.Sachin
Nawani, Mr.R.C.Ray and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocates.
Mr.Amit Mehra, Advocate for Mr.Ajay Verma, Standing Counsel, DDA
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Standing Counsel (LA), GNCT Delhi with Mr.Sachin
Nawani, Mr.R.C.Ray and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocates.
Mr.Amit Mehra, Advocate for Mr.Ajay Verma, Standing Counsel, DDA
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
JUDGMENT
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to Reporter or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRADEEP NANDRAIQG. L For orders see LA.APP.No.971/2008. —JTSX-Sssi
JUDGE JUNE 07, 2011 dk