Full Text
Translation output
$-27 HIGH COURT OF DELHI /udgment eservedOn: 6thIune, 2011
/ / /uc/gment veiiverea Un: I" June, ivi i
/ / /uc/gment veiiverea Un: I" June, ivi i
LA.APP. 75/2009
SHRI OM PRAKASH Appellant
Through: Mr.Hans Raj Singh and Mr.V.K.Singh, Advocates.
SHRI OM PRAKASH Appellant
Through: Mr.Hans Raj Singh and Mr.V.K.Singh, Advocates.
VERSUS
UOI AND ANOTHER Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Standing Counsel
• (LA), GNCT Delhi with Mr.Sachin
Nawani, Mr.R.C.Ray and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocates.
Mr.Amit Mehra, Advocate for Mr.Ajay
• Verma, Standing Counsel, DDA
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Standing Counsel
• (LA), GNCT Delhi with Mr.Sachin
Nawani, Mr.R.C.Ray and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocates.
Mr.Amit Mehra, Advocate for Mr.Ajay
• Verma, Standing Counsel, DDA
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the
JUDGMENT
?
To be referred to Reporter or not? Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
PRADEEP NANDRAIOGI J. •
For orders see LA.APP.No.971/2008.
(PRADEEP.
JUNE 07, 2011 NJRAJO) dk U 2011:DHC:11311
To be referred to Reporter or not? Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
PRADEEP NANDRAIOGI J. •
For orders see LA.APP.No.971/2008.
(PRADEEP.
JUNE 07, 2011 NJRAJO) dk U 2011:DHC:11311