SPYKAR LIFESTYLES P LTD v. RAGHUBIR SARAN CHARITABLE TRUST LTD. AND ORS.

Delhi High Court · 08 Jun 2011 · 2011:DHC:11441-DB
S. Ravindra Bhat; Rajiv Shakdher
FAO(OS) 307/2011
2011:DHC:11441-DB
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal after the appellant consented to early hearing of the respondent's interim application and sought withdrawal, condoning the delay and disposing of pending applications.

Full Text
Translation output
$-7 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
FAQ (OS) 307/2011
CM APPL.l 1711-11713/2011 SPYKAR LIFESTYLES P LTD Appellant
Through: Mr.Chetan SharmaSr. Advocatewith Mr.Jaspreet Sareen & Mr. Angad Varma, Advocates.
VERSUS
RAGHUBIR SARAN CHARITABLE TRUST LTD.
AND ORS. Respondents
Through: Mr. Simran Mehta, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
ORDER o/o 08.06.2011 CM No.11712/2011 (Delay)
Issue notice.
Mr. Simran Mehta, Advocate accepts notice on behalfof therespondent.
For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed. The delay is condoned.
FAO(OS) No.307/2011 & CM Nos. 11711/2011.11713/2011
After some hearing, Mr. Chetan Sharma, learned senior counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant will be satisfied ifthe interim application filed by the plaintiff (respondent in the present Appeal) is heard early. The respondent's counsel is present; he has no objection to this submission.
2011:DHC:11441-DB :2:
Inthese circumstances, tlie apphcation betaken up bythe learned Single
Judge for hearing at an early date and disposed of as expeditiously as possible as per his convenience.
The matter and the pending applications in all the suits shall be listed for direction, to facilitate this process, before the learned Single Judge on 5^^^ July, 2011.
In viewof the above order, learned senior counsel for the appellant seeks liberty to withdraw the Appeal. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed. All pending
^ applications stand disposed of With the consent of learned counsel for the respondent, the direction issued for deposit of amount in Court, within two weeks as directed by the learned
Single Judge, in the impugned order, is extended by further two weeks.
JUNE 08,2011 hk S.RAVINDRABHAT (VACATION JUDGE)
RAjtv SHAKDHER (VACATION JUDGE)
2011:DHC:11441-DB
JUDGMENT