Chothani Dipakkimar Karasan v. Union of India and Anr

Delhi High Court · 13 Jun 2011 · 2011:DHC:17306
S. Muralidhar
W. P. (C) 4286/2011
2011:DHC:17306
administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to permit the petitioners to appear in the counseling session on the scheduled date or the immediate next day, allowing their writ petitions.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
#20
W. P. (C) 4286/2011
CHOTHANI DIPAKKIMAR KARASAN Petitioner
Through: Mr. Dinesh Rastogi, Advocate.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Respondents
Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate for R-1 &
R-2.
#31
W. P. (C) 4301/2011
DR. MANJUNATHA A. Petitioner
Through: Mr. Dinesh Rastogi, Advocate.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Respondents
Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate for R-1 &
R-2.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR
13.06.2011 CM APPL No. 8794 of 2011 (for exemption)
CM APPL No. 8718 of 2011 (for exemption)
ORDER

1. Exemption allowed subjectto alljust exceptions.

2. The applications are disposed of. fy. p. (C) Nos.4386 &4301/2011 Page 1of[2] 2011:DHC:17306

W. P. (C) 4301/2011 and CM APPL No. 8717/2011 (for direction)

3. Having heard counsel for the parties and considering the facts and the special circumstances as pointed out in these petitions, a direction is issued to the Respondents to permit each of the Petitioners to appear in the counseling on 15"^ June 2011, and iffor any reason itis not possible on that date, onthe following day, 16"" June 2011.

4. The writ petitions and pending applications are disposed of A copy of order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties under signature of the JUNE 13, 2011 ha

S. MURALIDHAR