Dev Sharma v. UOI and Anr.

Delhi High Court · 07 Jun 2011 · 2011:DHC:11217
Pradeep Nandrajog
LA.APP. 369/2007
2011:DHC:11217
other other Procedural

AI Summary

The judgment records procedural considerations about reporting and publication of the judgment without addressing substantive issues.

Full Text
Translation output
$-61 HIGH COURT OF DELHI ludament Reserved On: 6^^ lune. 2011 ludament Delivered On: tune. 2011
LA.APP. 369/2007
DEV SHARMA Appellant
Through: Mr.Deepak Khosia, Advocate.
UOI AND ANR.
Through:
VERSUS
Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Standing Counsel
(LA), GNCT Delhi with Mr.Sachin Nawani, Mr.R.C.Ray and
Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocates.
Mr.Amit Mehra, Advocate for Mr.Ajay Verma, Standing Counsel, DDA.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
JUDGMENT

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to Reporter or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRADEEP NANDRAIOG. I. For orders see LA.APP.No.971/2008. JUNE 07, 2011 dk

(PRADEEP NANDRAJOG) JUDGE