Full Text
Translation output
- w'" $-18 & 20 to 22 HIGH COURT OF DELHI AND
AND
AND
AND
BAIL APPLN. 864/2011
RAMKRISHAN GUPTA
RAMKRISHAN GUPTA
VERSUS
STATE OF NOT, DELHI 8c ANOTHER
BAIL APPLN. 866/2011
ASHISH GUPTA
ASHISH GUPTA
VERSUS
STATE OF NCT, DELHI & ANOTHER
BAIL APPLN. 867/2011
SURESH GUPTA
SURESH GUPTA
VERSUS
BAIL APPLN. 868/2011
SNEH LATA GUPTA
SNEH LATA GUPTA
VERSUS
Petitioner Respondent . Respondent Present: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Kamal Gupta, Advocate for the
Petitioners.
Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State.
Petitioners.
Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. P. MITTAL
15.06.2011 Crl. MA No.7233/2011 (exemption) in BAIL APPLN. 864/2011
Crl. MA No.7235/2011 (exemption) in BAIL APPLN. 866/2011
Crl. MA No.7236/2011 (exemption) in BAIL APPLN. 867/2011
Crl. MA No.7237/2011 (exemption) in BAIL APPLN. 868/2011
2011:DHC:7106 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Applications stand disposed of.
15.06.2011 Crl. MA No.7233/2011 (exemption) in BAIL APPLN. 864/2011
Crl. MA No.7235/2011 (exemption) in BAIL APPLN. 866/2011
Crl. MA No.7236/2011 (exemption) in BAIL APPLN. 867/2011
Crl. MA No.7237/2011 (exemption) in BAIL APPLN. 868/2011
2011:DHC:7106 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Applications stand disposed of.
BAIL APPLN. 864/2011
BAIL APPLN. 866/2011
Notice.
Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP accepts notice on behalf ofthe State.
It is contended that the FIR has been registered under Section 323/307/498A/504
/506 IPG read with Section 3/4 of'Dowry Prohibition Act at Police Station Sihani Gate, Ghaziabad, U.P. not on the complaint made by the victim or her father but by her uncle.
The Petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case including Ram Krishan Gupta, who is aged about 85 years and is the maternal grandfather (Nana) of the husband of Mrs. Ruchi.
In the facts and circumstances, the applications are allowed. The Petitioners are directed to be admitted to transit/interim bail for a period of 15 (fifteen) days w.e.f today i.e. 15"^ June, 2011. This period of15 days come to an end on 30"^ June, 2011.
In the event of their arrest, the Petitioners be admitted to bail on their furnishing
Personal Bond in the sum of ? 25,000/- each with one Surety in the like amount each to the satisfaction of the lO/SHO concerned so as to enable the Petitioners to apply for bail to the Court ofcompetent jurisdiction/to take appropriate remedy.
Dasti.
G. P. MITTAL (VACATION JUDGE)
JUNE 15,2011 vk 2011:DHC:7106
Notice.
Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP accepts notice on behalf ofthe State.
It is contended that the FIR has been registered under Section 323/307/498A/504
/506 IPG read with Section 3/4 of'Dowry Prohibition Act at Police Station Sihani Gate, Ghaziabad, U.P. not on the complaint made by the victim or her father but by her uncle.
The Petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case including Ram Krishan Gupta, who is aged about 85 years and is the maternal grandfather (Nana) of the husband of Mrs. Ruchi.
In the facts and circumstances, the applications are allowed. The Petitioners are directed to be admitted to transit/interim bail for a period of 15 (fifteen) days w.e.f today i.e. 15"^ June, 2011. This period of15 days come to an end on 30"^ June, 2011.
In the event of their arrest, the Petitioners be admitted to bail on their furnishing
Personal Bond in the sum of ? 25,000/- each with one Surety in the like amount each to the satisfaction of the lO/SHO concerned so as to enable the Petitioners to apply for bail to the Court ofcompetent jurisdiction/to take appropriate remedy.
Dasti.
G. P. MITTAL (VACATION JUDGE)
JUNE 15,2011 vk 2011:DHC:7106
JUDGMENT