Full Text
Translation output
$-28 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 2009/2011
VARUN KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Mr. S. Santanam Swaminadhan, Mr. Gautam Panjwani and Mr. Prakash Chandra Arya, Advs.
CRL.M.C. 2009/2011
VARUN KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Mr. S. Santanam Swaminadhan, Mr. Gautam Panjwani and Mr. Prakash Chandra Arya, Advs.
VERSUS
STATE & ANR. Respondent
Through: Mr. Sanjay Lau, APP for State with SI Satish Kumar, PS Rajauri Garden
Through: Mr. Sanjay Lau, APP for State with SI Satish Kumar, PS Rajauri Garden
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURESH KAIT
24.06.2011 In this case, the applicant/accused is involved in an offence under Section 379 IPC for stealing a mobile phone, therefore, FIR No. 150/2009 was registered at Police Station
Rajouri Garden, Delhi.
By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR NO. 150/2009 since the matter has already been compromised with the complainant. The affidavit of compromise of respondent no. 2 Madan Lai Sachdeva is on record at
43-44.
Learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that the complainant Madan Lai Sachdeva s/o Thakur Lai
Sachdeva with 10 is personally present in the court and complainant is identified by the 10.
Keeping in view the compromise between the parties, I hereby quash the FIR No. 150/2009 and subsequent proceedings thereto. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
2011:DHC:11373 Copy of the order be given dasti under the signature of
SURESH KAIT
(VACATION JUDGE)
JUNE 24, 2011 Rs 2011:DHC:11373
24.06.2011 In this case, the applicant/accused is involved in an offence under Section 379 IPC for stealing a mobile phone, therefore, FIR No. 150/2009 was registered at Police Station
Rajouri Garden, Delhi.
By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR NO. 150/2009 since the matter has already been compromised with the complainant. The affidavit of compromise of respondent no. 2 Madan Lai Sachdeva is on record at
43-44.
Learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that the complainant Madan Lai Sachdeva s/o Thakur Lai
Sachdeva with 10 is personally present in the court and complainant is identified by the 10.
Keeping in view the compromise between the parties, I hereby quash the FIR No. 150/2009 and subsequent proceedings thereto. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
2011:DHC:11373 Copy of the order be given dasti under the signature of
SURESH KAIT
(VACATION JUDGE)
JUNE 24, 2011 Rs 2011:DHC:11373
JUDGMENT