Ajit Singh v. State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi

1. BAIL APPL No.826/2011 AJIT SINGH Petitioner Througli: Mr. Niraj Chaudhary, Advocate.

VERSUS

STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Respondent Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State with AS! Rishali Yadav, PS Tilak Nagar. Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv. for complainant.

2. BAIL APPL No.827/2011 DALBIR SINGH..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Niraj Chaudhary, Advocate. versus with ASI Rishali Yadav, PS Tilak Nagar. Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv. for connplainant.

3. BAIL APPL No.828/2011 SONIA Petitioner versus

4. BAIL APPL No.829/2011 JASWINDER KAUR Petitioner versus BAIL APPLNs 826-832/2011 > 2011:DHC:7086

5. BAIL APPL No.830/2011 BALJIT KAUR Petitioner versus Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, APR for the State

6. BAIL APPL No.831/2011 DILBAGH SINGH Petitioner versus

7. BAIL APPL No.832/2011 SURJEET SINGH Petitioner versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER ^ % 27.06.2011 CRL. M.A. Nos. 7146-7152/2011 (Exemption) The Exemption Applications are allowed subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of.

BAIL APPLN 828/2011 BAIL APPLN 826/2011 BAIL APPLN 827/2011 BAIL APPLN 829/2011 BAIL APPLN 830/2011 BAIL APPLN 831/2011 BAIL APPLN 832/2011& CrI. M.A. No. 7199/2011(earlv hearing)

1. These Bail Applications are being disposed of by this common order.

2. As per the order dated 08.06.2011, the applicants have ^ brought ?2,00,000 in cash in the Court today. As per the directions contained in the order dated 08.06.2011, the said amount was ordered to be deposited in the name of Investigating Officer and interest to be given to the complainant/informant during the pendency of the trial.

3. The complainant who is present in person today in the Court states that the said amount be given to her, as she needs the money to get her daughter who is aged about 3 ¥2 years admitted in some school and for other expenses.

4. In the interest of justice and in view of the welfare of the girl % child, I modify the order dated 08.06.2011 that instead of depositing of the money in the name of 10, I direct that the amount of ^2,00,000 brought in cash by the applicants today be given to the complainant who is personally present today in Court and she is unidentified by the concerned 1.0.

5. The aforesaid amount is handed over to the complainant who is present in the court today. She has checked the amount and found the same to be of the correct amount. Since the applicants have complied with the order dated 08.06.2011, therefore, all the applicants are admitted on anticipatory bail on their furnishing personal bonds in the sum of ^.25,000/- with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate.