Full Text
Translation output
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 8266 of 2004
PETITIONER:
KAMLESH MITTAL
RESPONDENT:
BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. & ORS
DATE OF
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 8266 of 2004
PETITIONER:
KAMLESH MITTAL
RESPONDENT:
BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. & ORS
DATE OF
JUDGMENT
: 21/02/2008
BENCH:
DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT & P. SATHASIVAM & AFTAB ALAM
JUDGMENT:
BENCH:
DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT & P. SATHASIVAM & AFTAB ALAM
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT
O R D E R
CIVIL APPEAL NO.8266 OF 2004
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Considering the nature of the controversy, we direct that the claim of the appellant which is for about 7 Biswas, shall be alloted to her in Plot No. 4323 instead of Plot No. 4324 on the
Western side.
The appeal is accordingly disposed of. No costs.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.8266 OF 2004
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Considering the nature of the controversy, we direct that the claim of the appellant which is for about 7 Biswas, shall be alloted to her in Plot No. 4323 instead of Plot No. 4324 on the
Western side.
The appeal is accordingly disposed of. No costs.