Full Text
Translation output
-b ( I 22# s- | HIGH COURT OF DELHI -r- w.P.(cRL) 930120rr
NEERAJ GIIPTA & ANR ..... Petitioners fhrough: Mr. Nitin Sehgal, Advocate for
Petitioner No. 1 along with Pctitioner No. 1 in person.
Mr. Brij Bhushan Solaanki, Advocate for Petitioner No. 2 along with
Petitioner No. 2 in Person.
VETSUS
STATI]
Through: Mr. Kushagra or;;;,o"rilrl"tllrn Prabhakar and Ms. Damini I(haira, Advocates for Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with
ASI Inderjeet Singh.
NEERAJ GIIPTA & ANR ..... Petitioners fhrough: Mr. Nitin Sehgal, Advocate for
Petitioner No. 1 along with Pctitioner No. 1 in person.
Mr. Brij Bhushan Solaanki, Advocate for Petitioner No. 2 along with
Petitioner No. 2 in Person.
VETSUS
STATI]
Through: Mr. Kushagra or;;;,o"rilrl"tllrn Prabhakar and Ms. Damini I(haira, Advocates for Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with
ASI Inderjeet Singh.
CORAM:
HON'BI,E MS. JIJSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
04.07.20L1 Crl.
M.A. No. 73751201L (Exemrrtion)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P. (Crl.) No. 930/2011 fhis is a petition for cluashing of IrIR No. 13612010 under Sections
4g8N406IPC registered at PS Prashant Vihar, Delhi'
"I'he Complainant/Petitioner No. 2 Ms. Shilpi Gupta is present in person. She states that the Petitioner No.l and Petitioner No. ZlComplainant
V4/.P.(CRL) 930/2011 2011:DHC:17959 i|r have cntered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Petitioner No. 2/Complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on l" March, 20IL. As full and final settlement of all the claims of the Petitioner No. 2, the
Petitioner No. t has to pay {13 lakhs out of which {8 lakhs have alrcady been paid to her and {5 lakhs have been paid to her today vidc dernand draft
No. 620669 dated 27th June,20Il drawn on state Bank of India, I(arnal' she further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue thc abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free wi|l, volition and without any coercion and no useful plllpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the sailte would create fuither acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. conscquently, FIR No. 13612010 under sections 498N406 IPC registered at PS Prashant vihar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. w.P.(cRL) e3o/2011
Puge 2 oJ 3 pafties, who are duly identified by their respective counsels, have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statetnents tnade before this Court.
Thc petition is disposed of. Order dasti' Wrr-,r=U-
.MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 04,2011 tvnt \.)
JlAdtu I ' A?.., v{r\'.' d.91o*n- orl 3 lb I , l)st
{4d t(^- S dcr.ca. w.P.(cRL) 9s0/2011 t la."c,ei-hi
.AL;,hi4"toh 't=-) F
9 t-€L^-L4rtr'/
U q^-*\A'--\ W4u
)r\,-**€*
( puieu>)vnn*)
'?*,o*tr( No I
04.07.20L1 Crl.
M.A. No. 73751201L (Exemrrtion)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P. (Crl.) No. 930/2011 fhis is a petition for cluashing of IrIR No. 13612010 under Sections
4g8N406IPC registered at PS Prashant Vihar, Delhi'
"I'he Complainant/Petitioner No. 2 Ms. Shilpi Gupta is present in person. She states that the Petitioner No.l and Petitioner No. ZlComplainant
V4/.P.(CRL) 930/2011 2011:DHC:17959 i|r have cntered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Petitioner No. 2/Complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on l" March, 20IL. As full and final settlement of all the claims of the Petitioner No. 2, the
Petitioner No. t has to pay {13 lakhs out of which {8 lakhs have alrcady been paid to her and {5 lakhs have been paid to her today vidc dernand draft
No. 620669 dated 27th June,20Il drawn on state Bank of India, I(arnal' she further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue thc abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free wi|l, volition and without any coercion and no useful plllpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the sailte would create fuither acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. conscquently, FIR No. 13612010 under sections 498N406 IPC registered at PS Prashant vihar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. w.P.(cRL) e3o/2011
Puge 2 oJ 3 pafties, who are duly identified by their respective counsels, have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statetnents tnade before this Court.
Thc petition is disposed of. Order dasti' Wrr-,r=U-
.MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 04,2011 tvnt \.)
JlAdtu I ' A?.., v{r\'.' d.91o*n- orl 3 lb I , l)st
{4d t(^- S dcr.ca. w.P.(cRL) 9s0/2011 t la."c,ei-hi
.AL;,hi4"toh 't=-) F
9 t-€L^-L4rtr'/
U q^-*\A'--\ W4u
)r\,-**€*
( puieu>)vnn*)
'?*,o*tr( No I
JUDGMENT