Full Text
Translation output
'L
I
#18
% 04.07.2011
Present: Petitioners in person with Mr. Shantnu Bhardwaj, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Ms. Fizani Husain, APP for respondent No.l/State.
Respondent no.2 in person who is identified by 10 Inspector
Ram Phal, P.S. Nangloi.
+Crl.M.A. N0.7370/2011(Exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
+Crl.M.C. No.2043/2011
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR
No.213/2005 registered at P.S. Tilak Nagar under Section 498A/405 IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2.
)
The ground for seeking quashing is that the FIR is the result of matrimonial discord which has been amicably settled and now there is no
\ dispute left between them.
The petitioners have placed on record, along with the petition, a copy of the settlement arrived at between them as well as respondent
No.2 during mediation proceedings conducted at Delhi Govt. Mediation &
Conciliation Centre, Delhi Dispute Resolution Society (Regd.).
Both the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 confirm having arrived at aforesaid settlement.
Respondent No.2 confirms that she has arrived at aforesaid settlement with the petitioners of her own accord without any inducement
2011:DHC:11381
Ifii or threat from any corner. She submits that the FIR was the result of a matrimonial dispute which has been amicably resolved and in view of the settlement, she does not wish to prosecute the petitioners and she has no objection if the FIR registered on her complaint is quashed. Both the petitioners as well as respondent no.2 undertake that they shall be bound by the terms of settlement recorded in Annexure P-5 to the petition.
Learned Ms. Fizani Husain, APP appearing on behalf of respondent
No.l/State submits that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, State has no objection if the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Since the parties have amicably settled the matter, I feel that no purpose shall be served in keeping the FIR and the proceedings arising out of the same alive. Accordingly, the FIR No.213/2005 under Section
498A/406 IPG registered at P.S. Tilak Nagar and the proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.
Petition stands disposed of.
JULY 04, 2011 (AJIT BHARIHOKE) pst JUDGE
2011:DHC:11381
I
#18
% 04.07.2011
Present: Petitioners in person with Mr. Shantnu Bhardwaj, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Ms. Fizani Husain, APP for respondent No.l/State.
Respondent no.2 in person who is identified by 10 Inspector
Ram Phal, P.S. Nangloi.
+Crl.M.A. N0.7370/2011(Exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
+Crl.M.C. No.2043/2011
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR
No.213/2005 registered at P.S. Tilak Nagar under Section 498A/405 IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2.
)
The ground for seeking quashing is that the FIR is the result of matrimonial discord which has been amicably settled and now there is no
\ dispute left between them.
The petitioners have placed on record, along with the petition, a copy of the settlement arrived at between them as well as respondent
No.2 during mediation proceedings conducted at Delhi Govt. Mediation &
Conciliation Centre, Delhi Dispute Resolution Society (Regd.).
Both the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 confirm having arrived at aforesaid settlement.
Respondent No.2 confirms that she has arrived at aforesaid settlement with the petitioners of her own accord without any inducement
2011:DHC:11381
Ifii or threat from any corner. She submits that the FIR was the result of a matrimonial dispute which has been amicably resolved and in view of the settlement, she does not wish to prosecute the petitioners and she has no objection if the FIR registered on her complaint is quashed. Both the petitioners as well as respondent no.2 undertake that they shall be bound by the terms of settlement recorded in Annexure P-5 to the petition.
Learned Ms. Fizani Husain, APP appearing on behalf of respondent
No.l/State submits that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, State has no objection if the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Since the parties have amicably settled the matter, I feel that no purpose shall be served in keeping the FIR and the proceedings arising out of the same alive. Accordingly, the FIR No.213/2005 under Section
498A/406 IPG registered at P.S. Tilak Nagar and the proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.
Petition stands disposed of.
JULY 04, 2011 (AJIT BHARIHOKE) pst JUDGE
2011:DHC:11381
JUDGMENT