Full Text
Translation output
7# $
* IN THE HI(;H COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 353/2011 & Cr1.
M.A. No. 3141/2011 (interim protection)
1-TARt OM & ORS Petitioners
Through: Petitioners in person.
* IN THE HI(;H COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 353/2011 & Cr1.
M.A. No. 3141/2011 (interim protection)
1-TARt OM & ORS Petitioners
Through: Petitioners in person.
VERSUS
STATE & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate for
Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with SI Asha Ram, PS
Gandhi Nagar.
Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate for
Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with SI Asha Ram, PS
Gandhi Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
05.07.2011
By this petition the Petitioners who are major seek protection from their relations, that is, Respondent Nos. 4 and 5. A status report has been filed which states that statements of Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 were recorded who stated that since the Petitioners are major, they have no objection to their marriage, initially though two communications were received, however, no FIR was registered thereon as no cognizable offence was found to be made. The Petitioners have no threat perceptions now.
The Petitioners who are present in person state that now they have no grievance from their relations and they are living happily and peacefully and rl/.P. (CRL) 353/2011
2011:DHC:17964 do not want to pursue the present petition.
In view of the statement made by the Petitioners, the present petition and application are dismissed as not pressed.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 059 2011
'vn, WP. (CRL) 353/2011 Page 2 oJ2
2011:DHC:17964
05.07.2011
By this petition the Petitioners who are major seek protection from their relations, that is, Respondent Nos. 4 and 5. A status report has been filed which states that statements of Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 were recorded who stated that since the Petitioners are major, they have no objection to their marriage, initially though two communications were received, however, no FIR was registered thereon as no cognizable offence was found to be made. The Petitioners have no threat perceptions now.
The Petitioners who are present in person state that now they have no grievance from their relations and they are living happily and peacefully and rl/.P. (CRL) 353/2011
2011:DHC:17964 do not want to pursue the present petition.
In view of the statement made by the Petitioners, the present petition and application are dismissed as not pressed.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 059 2011
'vn, WP. (CRL) 353/2011 Page 2 oJ2
2011:DHC:17964
JUDGMENT