0acf12087e2ebba0534238d5aaa0b9a366ad815a65b110a8a0d129cd40bc54eb

Delhi High Court · 05 Jul 2011 · 2011:DHC:17659
Kailash Gambhir
W.P.(C) No.1258/2011; W.P.(C) No.1260/2011; W.P.(C) No.1263/2011; W.P.(C) No.1264/2011
2011:DHC:17659
constitutional appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed four writ petitions for non-prosecution due to petitioners' failure to instruct their counsel and absence from Court.

Full Text
Translation output
9,10,12 &13#
% 05.07.2011
Present:- Mr.Rishabh Sancheti and Mr.Sumeer Sodhi, Advocates for the petitioner.
Mr.Sachin Datta with Ms.Gayatri Verma and
Mr.Jitendra, Advocates for the respondents No. 1,2 and 6.
+W.P.(C) No.1258/2011
W.P.(C) No. 1260/2011
W.P.(C) No.1263/2011
♦ ^ W.P.(C) No.1264/2011
Counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that they are no more representing these petitioners as they have not received any further instructions to represent them in the present writ petitions. Counsel thus seeks their discharge from these cases. It is ordered accordingly.
None of the petitioners are present today in Court and as per their counsel they have not been given any instructions to represent them any more. There is no option left to the Court except to dismiss these petitions for non- prosecution and the same are dismissed as SAjLch. n
July 05, 2011 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J dc
2011:DHC:17659
JUDGMENT