Vandana Kumar v. Manish Kumar

Supreme Court of India · 15 Jan 2008
S.B. Sinha; V.S. Sirpurkar
Transfer Petition (civil) 364 of 2005
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking continuation of travel and stay cost orders against the respondent after the petitioner started residing in Delhi.

Full Text
Translation output
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CASE NO.:
Transfer Petition (civil) 364 of 2005
PETITIONER:
VANDANA KUMAR
RESPONDENT:
MANISH KUMAR
DATE OF
JUDGMENT
: 15/01/2008
BENCH:
S.B. SINHA & V.S. SIRPURKAR
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT
O R D E R
It is accepted at the Bar that the petitioner has started living in Delhi. In that v iew of the matter, we are of the opinion that that part of the order whereby and whereunder the respondent-applicant was directed to pay and bear the costs of travelling and stay of the petitioner, quantified at Rs. 2,000/- per day for her appearance before the Court concerned, need not continue. With the aforementioned direction this application is dismissed.