Full Text
Translation output
"/ $- 11 HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P. (Crl.) No. 94912011
Shiv Kumar
Through: None VETSUS Petitioner STATE & Ors. Respondent
? Through: Mr Pawan Sharma, Adv.
Shiv Kumar
Through: None VETSUS Petitioner STATE & Ors. Respondent
? Through: Mr Pawan Sharma, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'tsLE MS JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
08.07.2011 This writ petition has been filed for the production of the petitioner's wife Ms Sushma Devi from the alleged illegal confinement of respondent No.
) 3 (Santo s/o Hari Prasad). As there was some error in the memo of parties, we had directed the learned counsel for the petitioner to file a complete and correct memo of parties on 0l.Ol.20ll, when this writ petition came up for hearing for the first time. The rnatter was renotified for 1I.07.20II.
However, today, on mentioning, the rnatter has been taken up inasmuch as oh
2011:DHC:17982-DB i ! -F t Mr Pawan Sharma, the learned counsel for the State, submitted that the petitioner's wife Ms Sushma Devi had been located. She is present in court as also the respondent No.3. The petitioner's wife Ms Sushma Devi has stated that she would like to reside with her husband (petitioner herein).
Insofar as the respondent No.3 is concerned, he has stated that he has no connection with petitioner's wife Ms Sushma Devi.
This writ petition is disposed of in view of the statement made by the petitioner's wife Ms Sushma Devi that she would now be residing with her husband as their dispute has been arnicably settled.
The next date of 1I.07 .201 1 stands cancelled.
1r [tt^-t > VEENA BIRBAL, J JULY 08, 2011 kb DAR DURREZ AHMED. J
2011:DHC:17982-DB
08.07.2011 This writ petition has been filed for the production of the petitioner's wife Ms Sushma Devi from the alleged illegal confinement of respondent No.
) 3 (Santo s/o Hari Prasad). As there was some error in the memo of parties, we had directed the learned counsel for the petitioner to file a complete and correct memo of parties on 0l.Ol.20ll, when this writ petition came up for hearing for the first time. The rnatter was renotified for 1I.07.20II.
However, today, on mentioning, the rnatter has been taken up inasmuch as oh
2011:DHC:17982-DB i ! -F t Mr Pawan Sharma, the learned counsel for the State, submitted that the petitioner's wife Ms Sushma Devi had been located. She is present in court as also the respondent No.3. The petitioner's wife Ms Sushma Devi has stated that she would like to reside with her husband (petitioner herein).
Insofar as the respondent No.3 is concerned, he has stated that he has no connection with petitioner's wife Ms Sushma Devi.
This writ petition is disposed of in view of the statement made by the petitioner's wife Ms Sushma Devi that she would now be residing with her husband as their dispute has been arnicably settled.
The next date of 1I.07 .201 1 stands cancelled.
1r [tt^-t > VEENA BIRBAL, J JULY 08, 2011 kb DAR DURREZ AHMED. J
2011:DHC:17982-DB
JUDGMENT