Full Text
LA.APP.126/2011
UOl Appellant
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate
Through: None
P 08.07.2011 CM No.4165/2011 There is a delay in filing the appeal.
The delay is condoned.
Application is allowed.
LA.APP. 12 6/2 011 For orders, see LA.APP.No. 784/2005.
-11 PRADEEP NAN DRAJOG, J.
JULY 08, 2011 mm 2011:DHC:13642 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELL-Il AT NEW DELHI wo Date 6f DecjiOfl SrhJu/y, 20L iN. T • • . . . . . . , . . i . .. . . t
APP18412Q. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
JAMNI\ Appellant
Through Mr L B Rat, Advocate, Mr S Dahiya, Advocate, 00
Mr D S Lakra, Advocate, Mr K Sunil, Advocate, Mr Anuj Bhandarl, Advocate
Mr Shadam Farshat, Advocate I
: •. ••: • . . . .. . ••: .::::
. ' . . . . . ., . •k4 .
Ljoi & ORS RespDndefltS
Through Mr Sanjay Poddar, Standing Cou nsel (LA), GNCT Delhi with i
Ms Deepika, Mr Sachin Nawani and Th Mr Siddharth Panda Advocates
Mr Ajay Verma, Ms Kanika Agnihotri, Mr Kunal Sharma, Mr Sumer Seth', Mr B B Sharma, Ms Shobhna Takiarand Mr Arun
Birbal, Advocates for DDA AND I
25 02 1997 & Award No 2/1999-2Q00, 'illage Mundka)
U
:
VT
ON
ME- i
125/2010, LAAPP 164/2010, LAAPP 185/2010, LAAPP
18/2010, LA APP 200/2010, LA APP 238/2010, LA APP
239/2010 LAAPP 243/2010 1 LAAPP 244/2010, LAAPP
245/2010, LAAPP 247/2010, LAAPP 251/2010, LAAPP
252/2010, LAAPP 266/2010, LAAPP 267/2010, LAAPP If
273/2010, LAAPP 274/2010, LAAPP 275/2010, LAAPP
312/2010, LA APP 324/2010, LA APP 326/2010, LA APP
327/2010 LAAPP 329/2010, LAAPP 330/2010, LAAPP
331/2010, LA APP 33212010, LA APP 333/2010 with CM APPL
No 5524/2011, LAAPP 335/2010, LAAPP 367/2010, LAAPP
368/2010, LAAPP 369/2010, LAAPP 371/2010 & QW. APPL
No 20099/2010, LA APP 374/2010, LA APP 375/20101 LA APP
377/2010, LAAPP 379/2010, LAAPP 423/2010, LAAPP
452/2010, LAAPP 461/2010, LAAPP 472/2010, LAAPP
694/2010, LA APP 696/2010 & CM APPL No 6340/2011, LA APP
• 697/2010 1 LAAPP 698/2010 & CM APPL 1734/2011, LAAPP
706/2010 & CM APPL 17215/2010, LA APP 707/2010, LA APP
708/2010, LA.APP. 709/20.10, LA.APP. 710/20.10 withcM APPL.:
No 2568/2011, LA APP 713/2010 with CM APPL No 7473/2010, LA APP 715/2019, LAAPP 717/2010, LA APP 71912010, LA APP
766/20101
798/2010, LAAPP 799/2010, LAAPP 818/210, LAAPP
819/2010, LAAPP 829/2010 1 LAAPP 831/2010 & CM APPL
955/2011, LA.APP. 832/20101 LA.APP. 8.33/2010 & CM. APPL • •
6392/2011, LAAPP 834/2010, LAAPP 842/2010, LAAPP
871/2010, LAAPP 874/2010, LAAPP 875/2010 1 LAAFf
876/2010, LA APP 877/2010, LA APP 878/2010, LA AIP
879/2010, LA APP 880/2010, LA APP 881/2010 & CM
884/2010, LAAPP 886/2010, LAAPP 888/2010, LAAPP
889/2010 & CM APPL2249/2011, LAAPP 890/2010, LAAPP
893/2010 & CM APPL 6750/2011, LA APP 894/2010 & CM
No 23353/2010, LAAPP 895/2010, LAAPP 896/2010, LAAPP
897/2010 & CM APPL728/2011, LAAPP 903/2010, LAAPP
907/2010, LA APP 938/2010, LAAPP 939/2010, LAAPP
1034/2010 & CM APPL 3086/2011, LA APP 104011010 & CM
(Relating to Notification s 4 dated 21 03 2003 Award
3/2005-06, Village-Mundka) V
383/2010, LAAPP 384/2010, LAAPP 385/2010, LAAPP
• ,'
473/2010, LA.APP. 492/20?10, LA•.APP.. '586/2.0.10, •,. LA.APP;
591/2010, LAAPP 638/2010, LAAPP 690/2010, LAAFP I
692/2010, LAAPP 711/2010, LAAPP 716/2010, LAAIP I
763/2010, LAAPP 872/2010, LAAPP 873/2010, LAAPP
885/2010, LAAPP 887/2010, LAAPP 891/2010, ' P,~]
892/2010, LAAPP 898/2010, LAAPP 906/2010 & CM APPL
NoA443/2010, LA APP 937/2010 & CM APPL 232p9/2010, • LA.APP.1042/201O, LA.APP: 10.47/2010 : . •, ... :
L
(Relating to Notification u/s 4 dated 21 03 2003 & Award
No 1/2005-06, Village-Mundka)
AND
•
CM APPL No 5656/2011, LA APP 1055/2010, LAAPP
) 1057/2010, LAAPP 1058/2010, LAAPP 1059/2010, LAAPP
1068/2010 LAAPP 1069/2010, LAAPP 124/2011, LAAPP
127/2011, LA APP 128/2011, LA APP 259/2011 V .
• LA.APP.784/2005 & connected , : ' Page 3 bf.19 annum determuled the sum arrived at as of 21 3 2003 as also
24 9 2003 The two sums arrived at were added and divided by two to arrive at the mean figure as of 21 3 2003, which I note comes to 15,92,083 33 per acre (In some decisions I note the sum arrived at is 15,92,215/) For the date 24 9 2003 the price determined was 20,411000I- per acre
ORDER
15 Pertaining to the notification dated 17 6 2005 pursuant whereto agricultural lands were acquired in village Bakkarwala and Mpndka the learned Reference Court adopted the minimum price for agricultural lands notified by the Government of. NCT Delhi with effect from 1 4 2001 and giving increase @10% pr annum determined the value and with I respect to the lands in villge Mundka, on account of locational advantage, being abutting NH-lU gave 5% more and determflned the fair market value as of 17.[6] 2005 in sum of, 21,37,017 75 per acre and for village Bakkarwala the price determined was 20,35,255/- per acre In the aforesaid backdlop of the factual scenario in 4ifh I have penned profiled the reasoning of the Land uisition ColIecor as also that of the Reference Court, 11 delve i?itdthe arguments advanced before me during hearing today.
17 With reference to the evidence led in LAC O No 384/2004 /amna Vs 1101 & Ors, it was urged by Sh LB Rai, Iarned counsel for the appellant in LA App No 784/2005, which argument was adopted by other learned counsel who appeared or the other applJant.s,. that the learhed Trial judg was bt justified ihignoring the sale deed Ex.P-I "vhereunder 1 biha would how that the Court assessed the fair ynarket value with reference to sale deeds executed between the years 1990 till the year 1996 either in Village Tikri Kalan or Village Mundka, apparently on the premise that being contiguous villagers, sale price of agricultural land in the 2 adjoining villages would be indicative of fair market value of land in Village Bakkarwala
26 In Pratap Singh's case (supra), the Division Bench was concerned with agricultural lands in Tikri Kalanand another adjoining Village named Ghevra and pertaining to various notifications issued under Section 4 of, the Land Acquisition Act determined the fair market value of agricultural lands in Village Tikri Kalan and Ghevra as under -