Full Text
Date of Decision: 06.07.2011
Sh.Ram Kumar …. Petitioner
Through Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate
…. Respondents
Through Mr.Nitish Gupta, Advocate
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
JUDGMENT
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NO ANIL KUMAR, J. *
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the question of the petitioner being declared as surplus was taken up by the counsel for the petitioner and argued before the Tribunal, however, no finding had been given by the Tribunal. 2011:DHC:3318-DB WP(C) No.525/2007
2. In the circumstances, on instructions from the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appropriate application for review of the order along with an application for condonation of delay in filing the application for review in the facts and circumstances of the case
3. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal to seek review of the impugned order and condonation of delay in filing the review application in accordance with law. ANIL KUMAR, J. SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J. July 06, 2011. vk