Full Text
Date of Decision: 06.07.2011
Bir Singh …. Petitioner
Through Dr.Kanwal Sapra, Advocate
Through Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate for respondent
No.1.
Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate for respondent No.2.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
JUDGMENT
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NO ANIL KUMAR, J. * On 5th July, 2011 the matter was argued on behalf of the petitioner and thereafter the matter was got adjourned by the learned counsel for the petitioner to seek instructions whether he wants to press the writ petition or not. 2011:DHC:3317-DB WP(C) No.520/2007 Today, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions states that the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition any further. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed. The parties are however, left to bear their own costs. ANIL KUMAR, J. SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J. July 06, 2011. vk