Full Text
Translation output
j/
$-3
* IN THD HIGH COURT w.P.(cRL) 847 /20tr
PRITAM
Through:
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioner
\4r. Rakesh Sachdeva, Adv.
(
VETSUS
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: IW. Asim for Mr. Ranjit Kapoor, ASC for State.
$-3
* IN THD HIGH COURT w.P.(cRL) 847 /20tr
PRITAM
Through:
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioner
\4r. Rakesh Sachdeva, Adv.
(
VETSUS
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: IW. Asim for Mr. Ranjit Kapoor, ASC for State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MT]KTA GT]PTA oh 07.07.2011
Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that during the pendency of the present petition the Government has already granted him parole for a period of one month vide order dated 9s June, 2000 and fuither prays that the parole be extended for one more month. I do not find any reason to extend the period of parole once the Competent Authority has applied its mind and granted the parole to the Petitioner for a period of one month.
Consequently, the present petition is dismissed.
W+*rL
MT]KTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 07,2011
'g'
2011:DHC:17977
Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that during the pendency of the present petition the Government has already granted him parole for a period of one month vide order dated 9s June, 2000 and fuither prays that the parole be extended for one more month. I do not find any reason to extend the period of parole once the Competent Authority has applied its mind and granted the parole to the Petitioner for a period of one month.
Consequently, the present petition is dismissed.
W+*rL
MT]KTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 07,2011
'g'
2011:DHC:17977
JUDGMENT