Full Text
Translation output
A-42
% 07.07.2011
Present: Mr. P.K. Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Viresh B. Saharya, Advocate for the respondent.
+ CM(M)No.167/2010 & CM No.2202/2010
*
The order impugned is the order dated 28.01.2010. The petitioner is aggrieved by the last paragraph of the order which reads as under:-
"In view ofthe submissions ofthe counselfor theJD, the counselfor the
JD is also directed to place on record the previous orders of the Hon'ble High
Couretin FAO No. 206/1996 along with details ofaccount number ofDDa. The same be filed in the court along with the cheques ofthe decreetal amount and accrued interest. Adjourned forfurtherproceedings on 05.02.2010. Copy ofthis orderbe given dasti to the counselfor the DDA/JDfornecessary compliance."
Perusal of this order shows that this is only a direction given to the
% 07.07.2011
Present: Mr. P.K. Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Viresh B. Saharya, Advocate for the respondent.
+ CM(M)No.167/2010 & CM No.2202/2010
*
The order impugned is the order dated 28.01.2010. The petitioner is aggrieved by the last paragraph of the order which reads as under:-
"In view ofthe submissions ofthe counselfor theJD, the counselfor the
JD is also directed to place on record the previous orders of the Hon'ble High
Couretin FAO No. 206/1996 along with details ofaccount number ofDDa. The same be filed in the court along with the cheques ofthe decreetal amount and accrued interest. Adjourned forfurtherproceedings on 05.02.2010. Copy ofthis orderbe given dasti to the counselfor the DDA/JDfornecessary compliance."
Perusal of this order shows that this is only a direction given to the
JUDGMENT
debtor/ petitioner to place on record the previous orders ofthe High Court in FAO No. 206/1996 along with details of its account number as also to place on record the cheque
(purported to have been paid by the judgment debtor) of the decreetal amount and the accrued interest. It is simply a direction.
There is no infirmity whatsoever in the said order. It does not in any manner call for any interference.
Dismissed.
INDERMEET KAUR,J.
JULY 07,2011 a
2011:DHC:10394
(purported to have been paid by the judgment debtor) of the decreetal amount and the accrued interest. It is simply a direction.
There is no infirmity whatsoever in the said order. It does not in any manner call for any interference.
Dismissed.
INDERMEET KAUR,J.
JULY 07,2011 a
2011:DHC:10394