Union of India v. Nirmala Devi Decd. Thru Lrs

Delhi High Court · 08 Jul 2011 · 2011:DHC:13439
Pradeep Nandrajog
LA.APP.833/2010 & CM APPL. No.6392/2011
2011:DHC:13439
property appeal_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court held that fair market value for land acquisition compensation must be determined as of the notification date with reasonable progressive increases from bona fide sale prices, allowing enhancement of compensation for agricultural lands in villages Mundka and Bakkarwala.

Full Text
Translation output
$-107 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
LA.APP.833 /2010 & CM APPL. No.6392/2011 (Cross
Objection)
UNION OF INDIA Appellant
Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar & Ms.Deepika Advocates
VERSUS
NIRMALA DEVI DECD. THRU LRS
•
& ORS Respondents
Through: Mr.S.S.Rana, Advocate for R-1 .CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
• % 08.07.2011
For orders, see LA.APP.No. 784/2005.
Tw PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
JULYO8,2011 mm 2011:DHC:13439 H I:
LAAPP 7912010, LAAPP 121/2010, LAAPP 122/2010, LAAPP
125/2010, LA APP 164/2010 LA APP 185/2010, LA APP
186/20101 LA APP 200/2010, LA APP 238/2010, LA APP
239/2010, LA APP 243/2010, LA APP 244/2010, LA APP
245/2010, LAAPP 247/2010 LAAPP 251/2010, LAAPP
252/2010, LAAPP 266/2010 1 LAAPP 267/2010, LAAPP
273/2010, LA APP 274/2010 LA APP 275/2010, LA APP
312/2010, LAAPP 324/2010, LA APP 326/2010, LAAPP
327/010, LA APP 329/2010, LA APP 330/2010, LA APP
331/2010, LA APP 332/2010, LA APP 333/2010 with CM APPL
No 552412011, LA APP 335/2010, LA APP 367/20101 LA APP
368/2010, LAAPP 369/2010, LAAPP 371/2010 & CM APPL
No 20099/20 10, LA APP 374/2010, LA APP 375/2010, LA APP
377/2010, LAAPP 379/2010, LAAPP 423/2010, LAAPP
452/2010, LAAPP 461/2010, LAAPP 472/2010, LAAPP
694/2010, LA APP 696/2010 & CM APPL 'No 6340/011, LA APP
697/2010, LAAPP 698/2010 & CM APPL 1734/Poll, LAAPP
706/2010 ' 708/2010 & CM APPL 17215/2010, LA APP 707/2010, LA APP
LA APP 709/2010, LA APP 710/2010 with CP APPL
No 2568/2011, LA APP 713/2010 With CM APPL No 7473/2010, • . • .
LA.APP. 715/2010, .LA.APP. 7.17/2010, LA.APP. 719/2.010,LAAPP ••
766/20101 LA APP 796/2010 1 LA APP 797/20101 LAAPP
798/2010, LAAPP 799/2010, LAAPP 818/2010, LAAPP
819/2010, LA APP 829/2010, LA APP 831/2010 &CMAPPL
L2.0LLLAAPP 832/2010, LAAPP 833/2010 & CM APPL
• . : _/2O1; LA.AP.P. 834/2010, LA.APP. . 42 •;. LA.APP.
871/2010, LAAPP 874/2010, LAAPP 875/2010, LAAPP
876/2010, LAAPP 877/2010, LAAPP 878/2010, LAAPP
879/20101 LAAPP 880/2010, LAAPP 881/2010 & CM
APPL65O5/2011 LAAPP 882/2010, LAAPP 883/2010, LAAPP
884/2010, LAAPP 886/2010, LAAPP 888/2010, LAAPP
889/2010 & CM APPL2249/2011, LAAPP 890/2010, LAAPP
893/2010 & CM APPL 6750/2011, LA APP 894/2010 & CM
No23353/2010, LAAPP 895/2010, LAAPP 896/2010, LAAPP
897/2010 & CM APPL728/2011, LAAPP 903/2010, LAPP
LAAPP784/2005&connected Page 2of19
J
H
90712010, LAAPP 938/2010, LAAPP 939/2010, LAAPP
1034/2010 & CM APPL 3086/2011, LA APP 1040/2010 & CM
APPL 5673/2011, LAAPP 1041/2010, LAAP 1043/2010, LAAPP 1045/2010, LAAPP 1046/2010, LAAPID 1048/2010, LA APP 1049/2010, LA APP 1050/2010, LAAPF 1056/2010, LA APP 1Q60/2010, LA APP 1061/2010, LA APP 1071/2010, LAAPP 125'/2011,LAAPP 126/2011,LA'APP 258/2011
(Relating to Notification u/s 4 dated 21 03 2003 & Award
No 3/2005-06, Villa e-Mundka g)
AND
LAAPP 600/2009, LAAPP 605/2009, LAAPP 615/2009, LA APP 310/2010, LA APP 325/2010, LA APP 376/2010, LA APP
383/2010, LAAPP 84/2010, LAAPP 385/2010, LAAPP
473/2010, LAAPP 492/2010, LAAPP 586/2010, LAAPP
591/2010, LAAPP 638/2010, LAAPP 690/2010, LAAPP. 692/2010, LAAPP 711/2010, LAAPP 716/2010, LAAPP
763/2010, LAAPP 872/2010, LAAPP 873/2010, LAAPP
885/2010, LAAPP 887/2010, LAAPP 891/2010, LAAPP
892/2010, LAAPP 898/2010, LAAPP 906/2010 & CM APPL
No4443/2010, LAAPP 937/2010 & CM APPL 23299/2010, LA APP 1042/2010, LA APP 1047/2010
(Relating to Notification u/s 4 dated: 21 03 2003 & Award
No 1/2005-06, Village-Mundka)
AND
LAAPP 1003/2010, LAAPP 1017/2010, LAAPF 1019/?010, LAAPP 1022/2010, LAAPP 1023/2010, LAAPI 1044/2010, . LAAPP 1051/2010, LAAPP 1053/2010, LAAPP 1054/2010 &
CM APPL No 5656/2011, LA APP 1055/2010, LAAPP
1057/2010, LAAPP 1058/2010, LAAPP 1059/2010, LAAPP
1068/2010, LAAPP 1069/2010, LAAPP 124/2011, LAAPP
127/2011,LAAPP 128/2011,LAAPP 259/2011
LA APP 784/2005 & connected
H® the price for one year @ 11 5% per arinum This price ws adopted for category A lands For lands in category B, the value was further discounted by 90,000I- per acre Pertaining to the notificatioAs dated 21 3 2003 and 24 9 2003, the Land
Acquisition Collector relied upon the notification fixing the minimum price of agricultural land as of 1 4 2001 and gave no benefit of enhancement with reference to the fact that the fair market va)ue of the lands to be determined was as of 21 8.2003 and 24 92003 Evenpertaining to the notification dated
17 6 2005 which required fair, market value of land to be determined in the revenue estate of village Bakkarwala and village Mundka as of 1.7.16.2005, the Land Acquisition Collector determined the same with reference to the notification fixing minimum value of agricultural lands Jn Delhi as of 1 4
2001 and gave no increase
ORDER
Acquisition Act 1894 and on the reference being made, vide various judgments and decrees, which are under challenge I in the above captioned appeals the Reference Court took corrective action, as per the view of the Reference Court, and enhanced the fair market value

12 In a nut shell, pertaining to the notification dated 25 2 1997 vide which agricultural lands in village Mundka were acquired, the Reference Court adopted the same notification as was adQpted by the Land Acquisition Collector under which the LA APP 784/2005 & connected 77, and 3 biswa of agricultural land in village Mundka was sold as of 5 8 1996 for a sale consideration of 4,75,000I- 38,000I- was incurned towards sale duty and thus the price of the land would b 5,13,000I- and calculated with reference thereto, land price per bigha would come to 4,46,000/- as of 5 8 1996 Learned coLnsel would urge that there is no reason not to hoki that fair market value of,agricultural lands in 'village Mundka was 4 1461000I- per bigha as of,5.8. 1996 1aking the argument forward, it is urged that with reference to the said price, fair market value needs to be determined as of 25 2 1993, 21 3 2003 and 17 6 2005, i e the dates when notifictions under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act were issued pursuant whereto agricultural lands were acquired in village Mundka,by increasing the price progressively, if not by 12% per annum 1 at least by 10% per nnum Itis urged that on the same bais, land price should be determined for the agricultural lands in village Bakkarwala Alternatively, Jt ivas urged th at,i..sirlce \Illlages Tikri Kalan, Mundka and Bakkawwala are contiguus villages, and in fact village Tikri Kalan is further towards he township of Robtak, some increase be made in the value of he land in village Mundka and Bakkarwala with reference to the )udgment and decree dated 19 12 2008 deciding a batch of Land Acquisition Appeals, lead matter being LA Ap3eal No 193/2006 Pratap Sincjh (Deceased) Thr. LR[5] Vs UQI as per which fair market value of land, per biglia, was determined in the revenue estate of village Tikri Kalan as of 16 11 1995, 11 6 1996 and 17 12 2002 at 2,15,164/- for category A lnd LA APP 784/200 & connected Page 10 of 19j........................