Full Text
Translation output
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 1980 of 2008
PETITIONER:
B.S.N.L. & Ors
RESPONDENT:
Rajesh Kumar Saxena
DATE OF
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 1980 of 2008
PETITIONER:
B.S.N.L. & Ors
RESPONDENT:
Rajesh Kumar Saxena
DATE OF
JUDGMENT
: 02/04/2008
BENCH:
TARUN CHATTERJEE & HARJIT SINGH BEDI
JUDGMENT:
BENCH:
TARUN CHATTERJEE & HARJIT SINGH BEDI
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT
O R D E R
CIVIL APPEAL NO.1980 OF 2008
(arising out of SLP(C)NO.3643 of 2007)
Heard Mr. K.C. Kaushik, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Manoj Swarup, learned counsel for the respondent.
We direct that the enquiry contemplated in our Judgment dated
13.3.2008 shall be completed positively within six months from today, for which learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits, on instruction, that the respondent undertakes to cooperate with the authorities. The enquiry will be completed without asking for any adjournment.
We also make it clear that the word ’appellant’ appearing twice on page 2 (paragraph 3) of the Judgment be read as ’respondent’
This order may be read along with the judgment delivered by us on
13.3.2008.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.1980 OF 2008
(arising out of SLP(C)NO.3643 of 2007)
Heard Mr. K.C. Kaushik, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Manoj Swarup, learned counsel for the respondent.
We direct that the enquiry contemplated in our Judgment dated
13.3.2008 shall be completed positively within six months from today, for which learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits, on instruction, that the respondent undertakes to cooperate with the authorities. The enquiry will be completed without asking for any adjournment.
We also make it clear that the word ’appellant’ appearing twice on page 2 (paragraph 3) of the Judgment be read as ’respondent’
This order may be read along with the judgment delivered by us on
13.3.2008.