Full Text
CRL.M.C. 2138/2011
SANJU BHATIA & ORS ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr. Rajan Bhatia, Advocate.
Petitioner No. 1 in person.
Through :Mr. Arvind K. Gupta, APP.
Mr. V.K. Singh, Advoacte for R-2 R-2 in person.
ORDER o/o 13.07.2011 An FIR No. 212/2008 was registered under Sections
498A/406/34 IPC in P.S. Mandawali, Delhi against the Petitioners.
The Petitioner No. 1 is the husband of Respondent No. 2 and the
Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are the relatives of Petitioner No. 1.
Both the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 are present in person today in the Court.
Learned counsel for the State submits that the Charge
Sheet has already been filed in the matter but the Charge has not yet been framed.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 has filed a petition for dissolution of their marriage by mutual consent under Section
JUDGMENT
13 B (2) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Accordingly a decree of divorce was granted to them under Section 13 B (2) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the marriage between the parties has been dissolved vide decree of divorce dated 26th May, 2011. Respondent No. 2/Ms. Ruchi Bhatia is present in the Court and is identified by Mr. V.K. Singh, Advocate. She submits that she has settled all the issues qua FIR No. 212/2008 against the Petitioners and nothing remained pending against the Petitioners qua this FIR. CRL.M.C. 2138/2011 2011:DHC:15406 Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that 1.8,10,000/has already been paid to Respondent No. 2 and further an amount of 1.3,90,000/- has been paid today to Respondent No. 2 vide Bankers cheque No. 00562 dated 08.07.2011 payable at Ashok Vihar, Phase I, New Delhi. The Respondent No. 2 has received the aforesaid cheque in lieu of full and final settlement and accepted the same in the Court today. Respondent No. 2 has produced! her Identity Card issued! by the Election Commission of India vide No. TLE0696781 in her name. The original Election Identity Card is seen and returned to her after perusing the same and foum:t correct. Since, the parties have settled their disputes and Respondent No. 2 does not want to pursue the FIR in question therefore, in the interest of justice, I quash the FIR No. 212/2008, PS Mandawali, and the proceedings emanating therefrom. Accordingly, the Crl. M. C. No.2138/2011 is disposed of. Dasti. JULY 13, 2011 j CRL.M.C. 2138/2011 ~ SURESH KAIT,J