UOI & Ors. v. I. Yeshudanam

Delhi High Court · 14 Jul 2011 · 2011:DHC:3512-DB
Anil Kumar; Sudershan Kumar Misra
WP(C) No.6003/2010
2011:DHC:3512-DB
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition in default and for non-prosecution due to the petitioners' failure to comply with procedural requirements and take steps for service of notice.

Full Text
Translation output
WP(C) No.6003/2010 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.6003/2010
Date of Decision: July 14, 2011
UOI & ORS. …... Petitioners
Through None.
VERSUS
I. YESHUDANAM ..... Respondent
Through None.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA ANIL KUMAR, J. (ORAL)
JUDGMENT

1. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner though the matter was passed over once.

2. Office report indicates that the notice could not be issued as the process fee and the address were not filed by the petitioners.

3. On 6th April, 2011, it had transpired that the notice was not issued pursuant to the order dated 21st January, 2011 as the steps were not taken by the petitioner.

4. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. 2011:DHC:3512-DB WP(C) No.6003/2010 CM No.11820/2010

5. Since the main petition has been dismissed in default and for non-prosecution, this application does not survive and the same is dismissed. The interim order dated 6th September, 2010 is vacated. ANIL KUMAR, J. SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J. JULY 14, 2011 dr