Mahesh Chand v. State

Delhi High Court · 15 Jul 2011 · 2011:DHC:18760
Mukta Gupta
W.P.(CRL) 688/2011
2011:DHC:18760
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 325, 452, 120-B, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would serve no useful purpose.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 688/2011
MAHESH CHAKD & ORS Petitioner
Through Mr.Anurag Jain, Advocate with Petitioners in person.
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through Mr.Vikas Pahwa, Additional Standing Counsel with ASI Kanta Prasad, P.S.
Mandawali
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER o/„ 15.07.2011
9- Clr.M.A.5804/2011 (Exemption)
Allowed, subjectto alljust exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.rCrU 688/2011 By this petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.146/2010 under Sections 325/452/120-B/34 IPG registered at Police Station
Mandawali Fazadpur on the complaint of Petitioner No.l, Mr.Mahesh
Chand, againstPetitionerNos.3 to 6.
The Complainant/Petitioner No.l, Mr.Mahesh Chand, is present in
2011:DHC:18760 Court, who is identified byASI Kanta Prasad and his counsel. The Petitioner
Nos. 1 and 2state that they have amicably resolved his differences with
Petitioner Nos.3 to 6 and do not want to pursue the above-mentioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will and volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No.146/2010 under Sections 325/452/120-B/34
IPC registered at Police Station Mandawali Fazadpur and proceedings pursuant thereto arehereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition stands disposed of.
Order dasti.
JULY 15,2011 'dc' q)
MUKTA GUPTA,J a tfhjti 2011:DHC:18760
JUDGMENT