Full Text
Translation output
A-55
% 21.07.2011
Present: Mr. Peeyush Kulshreshtha, Advocate for the petitioner.
+ CM(M) No. 826/2011 & CM No. 13146/2011
*
By way of this petition, the petitioner prays that a time frame should be fixed for the disposal of the petition which has been filed by the petitioner under Section 14 (l)(a) of the Delhi
Rent Control Act and pending in the Court of District Judge, H.CA
Karkardooma Courts titled Rameshwari Devi Vs. Rajrani in MACT-y^
Case No. 11/2011. Contention is that for unnecessary reason, the matter has been delayed and prolonged; the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 71 years and the petition had been filed in the year
2007.
At this stage, after some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw this petition; he will be moving an appropriate apphcation bringing the aforenoted facts to the notice of the concerned court and it is hope and expected that the court shall dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible.
With these directions, petition is disposed of.
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
JULY 21, 2011 / a - /Wi. ^ -"a
()^ i'/irlC"! i! i^'
2011:DHC:18931
A-21
% 23.8.2011
Present: None.
+CM(M) No.826/2011
*•
File taken up on office note.
I
The last word in the 5th line shall read as "MCA" instead of
'MACT". Correction is made accordingly.
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
AUGUST 23, 2011 nandan
2011:DHC:18931
% 21.07.2011
Present: Mr. Peeyush Kulshreshtha, Advocate for the petitioner.
+ CM(M) No. 826/2011 & CM No. 13146/2011
*
By way of this petition, the petitioner prays that a time frame should be fixed for the disposal of the petition which has been filed by the petitioner under Section 14 (l)(a) of the Delhi
Rent Control Act and pending in the Court of District Judge, H.CA
Karkardooma Courts titled Rameshwari Devi Vs. Rajrani in MACT-y^
Case No. 11/2011. Contention is that for unnecessary reason, the matter has been delayed and prolonged; the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 71 years and the petition had been filed in the year
2007.
At this stage, after some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw this petition; he will be moving an appropriate apphcation bringing the aforenoted facts to the notice of the concerned court and it is hope and expected that the court shall dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible.
With these directions, petition is disposed of.
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
JULY 21, 2011 / a - /Wi. ^ -"a
()^ i'/irlC"! i! i^'
2011:DHC:18931
A-21
% 23.8.2011
Present: None.
+CM(M) No.826/2011
*•
File taken up on office note.
I
The last word in the 5th line shall read as "MCA" instead of
'MACT". Correction is made accordingly.
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
AUGUST 23, 2011 nandan
2011:DHC:18931
JUDGMENT