Full Text
Translation output
$-40 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 689/2011
AMIT PRASHAR & ORS
Through
W.P.(CRL) 689/2011
AMIT PRASHAR & ORS
Through
VERSUS
STATE & ANR
Through Petitioners Mr. K.K. Manan, Mr. Nipun Bhardwaj, Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advs. with Petitioners in person.
Respondents Mr. Pawan Sharma, SC for State with
Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Adv. with Mr. Dinesh Bhargava, ASI, P.S. Maurya
End.
Mr. Vishal Gosain, Adv. for R-2, with R-2 in person.
Through Petitioners Mr. K.K. Manan, Mr. Nipun Bhardwaj, Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advs. with Petitioners in person.
Respondents Mr. Pawan Sharma, SC for State with
Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Adv. with Mr. Dinesh Bhargava, ASI, P.S. Maurya
End.
Mr. Vishal Gosain, Adv. for R-2, with R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
21.07.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 347/2009 under Sections
498A/406/34 IPG registered at PS Maurya Enclave, Delhi.
The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Geeta ispresent inperson and is identified by her counsel. She states thatthe Petitioners and Respondent
No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the
21.07.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 347/2009 under Sections
498A/406/34 IPG registered at PS Maurya Enclave, Delhi.
The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Geeta ispresent inperson and is identified by her counsel. She states thatthe Petitioners and Respondent
No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the
W.P.(CRL) 689/2011
2011:DHC:18761 settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent NO. 2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on 1October, 2010. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims ofthe Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. 1has paid Rs. 8.10 lakhs outof which Rs. 4 lakhs have already been paidto her andRs. 4,10,000/- are being paid today in Court by way of demand draft No. 149103 dated 20^
July, 2011 drawn on The South Indian Bank Limited. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance ofthe proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 347/2009 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered atPS Maurya Enclave, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
2011:DHC:18761 settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent NO. 2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on 1October, 2010. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims ofthe Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. 1has paid Rs. 8.10 lakhs outof which Rs. 4 lakhs have already been paidto her andRs. 4,10,000/- are being paid today in Court by way of demand draft No. 149103 dated 20^
July, 2011 drawn on The South Indian Bank Limited. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance ofthe proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 347/2009 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered atPS Maurya Enclave, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
W.P.(CRL) 689/2011 P^ge 2 of3
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
Thepetition is disposed of. Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA,J JULY 21,2011 'ga' QjltniT I
^•9 ^
UJri/h
•3
X PcH^eA ^ f2^!^,4- ''^''<R(CRL) 689/2011 { page 3 of3
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
Thepetition is disposed of. Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA,J JULY 21,2011 'ga' QjltniT I
^•9 ^
UJri/h
•3
X PcH^eA ^ f2^!^,4- ''^''<R(CRL) 689/2011 { page 3 of3
JUDGMENT