Full Text
Translation output
s-s1 -T HIGH COURT OF DELHI CRL.REV .P . 41112009, Crl.M.A. 859612009, Cr1.M.A . 1640912010
SACHIN KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through IVIr. Anilendra Pandey, Adv. with petitioner in person.
SACHIN KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through IVIr. Anilendra Pandey, Adv. with petitioner in person.
VERSUS
MEENAKSHI & ANR.
Through R-l in person.
Through R-l in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA..... Respondent
27.07.2011 By this revision petition, the Petitioner had challenged the order directing the Petitioner to pay maintenance to the Respondent. During the pendency of the present petition the parties have amicably settled the matter and are living together.
Petitioner and Respondent No.l are present in Court. The Petitioner states that as long as parties are living together amicably he would be maintaining the Respondent No.1 and in case the Petitioner fails to maintain
Respondent No.l, Respondent No.l would be at liberly to execute this order.
No further orders are called for in the present revision petition. o
Petition is disposed of.
IM//"r@- JULY 27,20l1loga' -Pru\ )
2011:DHC:19836
27.07.2011 By this revision petition, the Petitioner had challenged the order directing the Petitioner to pay maintenance to the Respondent. During the pendency of the present petition the parties have amicably settled the matter and are living together.
Petitioner and Respondent No.l are present in Court. The Petitioner states that as long as parties are living together amicably he would be maintaining the Respondent No.1 and in case the Petitioner fails to maintain
Respondent No.l, Respondent No.l would be at liberly to execute this order.
No further orders are called for in the present revision petition. o
Petition is disposed of.
IM//"r@- JULY 27,20l1loga' -Pru\ )
2011:DHC:19836
JUDGMENT