Full Text
Translation output
$-8 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 663/2011
NACHHABAR SINGH & ANR Petitioners
Through Mr. Niraj Chaudhry, Adv. with Petitioners in person.
CRL.M.C. 663/2011
NACHHABAR SINGH & ANR Petitioners
Through Mr. Niraj Chaudhry, Adv. with Petitioners in person.
VERSUS
STATE & ANR Respondents
Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State with Mr. K.K. Mishra, SI, P.S. Conn. Place
Mr. A.S. Sharma, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person.
Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State with Mr. K.K. Mishra, SI, P.S. Conn. Place
Mr. A.S. Sharma, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
21.07.2011 By this petition the Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 36/03 under
Section 408/420/467/468/471/120-B/34 IPG registered at P.S. Gonnaught Place, New Delhi on the complaint ofRespondent No.2.
As per the complaint it is alleged that Petitioner No.2 Ms. Harjeet Kaur who was looking after the personal bank accounts of the complainant's company in conspiracy with Petitioner No.1 stole the cheques from the cheque book, forged the same and encashed with the dishonest intention. While one such transaction was being made, the complainant was informed by the bank and it was revealed that Petitioner No.2 who had left the services earlier was now encashing the cheques which she had stolen through the Petitioner No.l.
21.07.2011 By this petition the Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 36/03 under
Section 408/420/467/468/471/120-B/34 IPG registered at P.S. Gonnaught Place, New Delhi on the complaint ofRespondent No.2.
As per the complaint it is alleged that Petitioner No.2 Ms. Harjeet Kaur who was looking after the personal bank accounts of the complainant's company in conspiracy with Petitioner No.1 stole the cheques from the cheque book, forged the same and encashed with the dishonest intention. While one such transaction was being made, the complainant was informed by the bank and it was revealed that Petitioner No.2 who had left the services earlier was now encashing the cheques which she had stolen through the Petitioner No.l.
CRL.M.C. 663/2011 page 1 of2
H
2011:DHC:10494 I The complainant/Respondent No. 2 is present in person and is identified by his counsel. He states that he has amicably settled the matter with the Petitioners.
Petitioners have paid back the money and have repented for their illegality. He further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, he does not want topursue theabovementioned FIRand theproceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 36/03 under Section 408/420/467/468/471/120-
B/34IPG registered at P.S. Connaught Place, New Delhi andproceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA,J JULY 21, 2011 'ga'
H
2011:DHC:10494 I The complainant/Respondent No. 2 is present in person and is identified by his counsel. He states that he has amicably settled the matter with the Petitioners.
Petitioners have paid back the money and have repented for their illegality. He further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, he does not want topursue theabovementioned FIRand theproceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 36/03 under Section 408/420/467/468/471/120-
B/34IPG registered at P.S. Connaught Place, New Delhi andproceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA,J JULY 21, 2011 'ga'
CRL.M.C. 663/2011 page 2 of2
J a 2011:DHC:10494
J a 2011:DHC:10494
JUDGMENT