Gyan Chand Kashyap v. State

Delhi High Court · 27 Jul 2011 · 2011:DHC:18751
Mukti Gupta
w.P.(cRL) s67 /2011
2011:DHC:18751
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of parole on the ground that the minimum interval since the last parole had not elapsed, finding no illegality in the competent authority's order.

Full Text
Translation output
$-45 HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(cRL) s67 /2011 GYAN CHAND KASHYAP ..... Petitioner
Through Ms. Aasha Tiwari, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Pawan Sharma, SC for state with Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Adv. with Mr. Surender Rana, SI, P.S. Uttam Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKT1 GUPTA
27.07.2011 Status report has been filed showing that last application was forwarded to the competent authority who considered and rejected the same because one year has not been elapsed from the last parole granted.
I find no illegality in the order passed by the competent authority.
There is no merit in the present petition.
Petition is dismissed. hn.,9LLfub (/ t '/' MUI(TA GUPTA.J
JULY 27,2011 'ga' 2011:DHC:18751
JUDGMENT