Amritash Agrawalla v. Union of India & Ors.; Bilkis Khatun v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 27 Jul 2011 · 2011:DHC:18111
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
W.P.(C) 2291/2010 & 3037/2010
2011:DHC:18111
constitutional petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed two writ petitions due to non-prosecution and repeated adjournments by the petitioners without issuing notice.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 2291/2010
/o AMRITASH AGRAWALLA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sushil Kumar Jain, Adv.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Mukesh Anand, Adv.
W.P.(C) 3037/2010
BILKIS KHATUN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sushil Kumar Jain, Adv.
VERSUS
UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Ashok Singh, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
27.07.2011 Today also adjournment is sought on behalf of the petitioners. A perusal of the order sheet shows that the notice ofthe petitions has not
WPs.(C) 2291/2010 & 3037/2010 Page 1 of2.
2011:DHC:18111 been issued and the counsel for the petitioners has been seeking repeated adjournments and at least on two occasions, last opportunity had bee~1 granted to the petitioner. The counsel for the petitioner is not willing to argue the petition today also.
Dismissed.
No order as to costs.
JULY 27,2011 anb WPs.(C) 229112010 & 303712010
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW,J Page 2 of2.
2011:DHC:18111
JUDGMENT