V K Diwan & Ors v. State & Anr

1 An FIR No. 125/2005 Petitioner Mr. K.S. Singh, Adv. Respondent Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for State Inspector Rakesh Kumar, Spl. Preet, counsel for R-2. was registered against the petitioners under Sections 420/193/468/471/120B IPG at P.S. Sabzi Mandi, Delhi.

2 Learned APP for state sub been filed and the order on char 3 Learned counsel for th compromise has already beer dated 06.03.2010 and since respondent No. 2 and petitione therefore, due to the interventi relatives and common friends, t among each other and respor pursue the case further. mits that the charge sheet has ge is yet to be framed. petitioner submits that a taken place vide settlement both the parties i.e. the 's are in relation to each other, on of the family members and ley have settled the disputes dent No. 2 does not want to 2011:DHC:10558

4 Mr. Rajesh Kumar Diwan, respondent No. 2 is personally present in the court today, who is identified by Inspector Rakesh Kumar/10 of the case.

5 Respondent No. 2 submits that he does not want to pursue the case further in lieu of settlement arrived at between the parties and he has no object on, if the aforesaid FIR is quashed.

6 In the above mentioned facts and circumstances and in the interest of justice, I quash the FIR No. 125/2005 and the proceedings emanating therefrom.

7 CrI. M.C. 1861/2011 is allowed and disposed of in the above terms.

8 I defer imposing cost on the CRL. M.A. 6671/2011 Since, the CrI. M.C. 1861/2(^ is disposed of being infructuous. JULY 22, 2011 j parties in this case. 11 is allowed, this application SURESH KAITJ