56a4ee2508c8bb92b3ca7ed7a405b93c64b217d8124c08726a25a096f67516e8

Delhi High Court · 22 Jul 2011 · 2011:DHC:10598
Ajit Bharihoke
2011:DHC:10598
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties and withdrawal of grievance by the complainant.

Full Text
Translation output
\
#46
% 22.07.2011
Present: Petitioners in person witli ivir. M.K.Duggal, Advocate.
Mr. Sunii Sharma, APPforthe respondent/State.
+Crl.M.A.8407/2011
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CrI.M.C. 2287/2011
Petitioners have placed on record their photographs duly attested
^by Sh. M.K.Duggal, Advocate, who identifies them. Learned counsel submits that he personally knows the parties and therefore, he is in a position to identify them.
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR
No.982/2005 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG registered at P.S. Rohini on the complaint of the petitioner No. 6.
'4
Ground for seeking quashing is that the FIR was the result of matrimonial discord between the petitioner No. 1 and the petitioner
No.6/complainant, which has been amicably resolved, and now petitioner
^ No. 1 and the petitioner No. 6 are happily living together in the matrimonial home since April, 2011.
Petitioner No. 6 confirms that she has arrived at an amicable settlement with the other petitioners of her own accord without any duress or threat from any corner and after the resolution of dispute, she is living happily with the other petitioners in her matrimonial home. She states that now, she has no grievance against either of the petitioners NO. 2011:DHC:10598
1 to 5 and in interest of her harmonious matrimonial life, she does not want the petitioners No. 1 to 5 to be prosecuted on the basis of her FIR and she has no objection if the FIR is quashed.
Learned APR appearing for the State submits that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. State has no objection if the
FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Since the parties have amicably settled the matter and now there is no dispute left, Ifeel that no useful purpose shall be served in prosecuting
^the petitioners No. 1 to 5 on the basis of FIR. Accordingly, FIR NO. 982/2005 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG registered at P.S. Rohini and the proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.
Petition stands disposed of.
Order dasti.
\
(AJIT BHARIHOKE)
JUDGE
JULY 22, 2011 akb
Ox
2011:DHC:10598
JUDGMENT