Full Text
Translation output
{ t
I o/o 25.07 .20tL
Present: Mr. Manish Singhvi, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Priyanka
Sharma and Ms. Shikha Tandon, Advocates for the
. Respondent.
+ FAO(OS) 338-339/20LL & CM 1-2834/20L1(Stay)
* We have heard the parties. In the first instance they pray that all the disputes between them may be referred to adjudication of the Delhi High Court Arbitration Centre.
Ordered accordingly.
The parties to appear before the Delhi High Court
Arbitration Centre on 3'd August, 20LL at 4p.m.
It is also not in dispute that the Receiver has taken over i the Warehouse in question. According to the Appellant some functional difficulties have been encountered in respect of which the learned Single Judge has been approached by way of an Interim Application.
The only observation that is prayed for from us is that any of the observations made in the impugned Order should be clarified to be only prima facie in nature. Mr. Sethi, learned
Senior Advocate, is quick to point out that this observation has, 2011:DHC:11596-DB t-
I in terms, been made in the penultimate paragraph of the impugned Order. Be that as it ilay, since the Appeal is being disposed of, we reiterate what has already been said by the learned Single Judge that any observation made in the impugned Order shall be prima facie in nature.
Appeal is disposed of. Pending application also stands disposed of.
I
- ltut\
V-
VIKRAMAIIT SEN, J.
Ld-l
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
July 25, 201,I vd<t
2011:DHC:11596-DB
I o/o 25.07 .20tL
Present: Mr. Manish Singhvi, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Priyanka
Sharma and Ms. Shikha Tandon, Advocates for the
. Respondent.
+ FAO(OS) 338-339/20LL & CM 1-2834/20L1(Stay)
* We have heard the parties. In the first instance they pray that all the disputes between them may be referred to adjudication of the Delhi High Court Arbitration Centre.
Ordered accordingly.
The parties to appear before the Delhi High Court
Arbitration Centre on 3'd August, 20LL at 4p.m.
It is also not in dispute that the Receiver has taken over i the Warehouse in question. According to the Appellant some functional difficulties have been encountered in respect of which the learned Single Judge has been approached by way of an Interim Application.
The only observation that is prayed for from us is that any of the observations made in the impugned Order should be clarified to be only prima facie in nature. Mr. Sethi, learned
Senior Advocate, is quick to point out that this observation has, 2011:DHC:11596-DB t-
I in terms, been made in the penultimate paragraph of the impugned Order. Be that as it ilay, since the Appeal is being disposed of, we reiterate what has already been said by the learned Single Judge that any observation made in the impugned Order shall be prima facie in nature.
Appeal is disposed of. Pending application also stands disposed of.
I
- ltut\
V-
VIKRAMAIIT SEN, J.
Ld-l
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
July 25, 201,I vd<t
2011:DHC:11596-DB
JUDGMENT