Full Text
Translation output
$-3e HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.(CRL) 84912011 & Crl.M.A.7020l20Il (interim protection)
NAZREEN & ANOTHER ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. A.K. Verma, Adv. VETSUS TIIE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & OTHERS ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Saleem Ahmed, A SC for State with Mr. Mukesh Kumar. SI. P.S.
Seelampur.
Mr. K.P. Singh, Adv. for R-3&4.
NAZREEN & ANOTHER ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. A.K. Verma, Adv. VETSUS TIIE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & OTHERS ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Saleem Ahmed, A SC for State with Mr. Mukesh Kumar. SI. P.S.
Seelampur.
Mr. K.P. Singh, Adv. for R-3&4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
20.07.201r Petitioners are present in person. Though the age of the Petitioner
No.1 is disputed by Respondent No.3 & 4 who are her parents who state that she is aged about 16 years 4 months at the time when she married the
Petitioner No.2. However, as per the Muslim Personal Law since the
PetitionerNo.l has attained the age of puberty she can validly consent for her marriage. Pursuant to a valid marciage, the husband of Petitioner No.1 i.e. Petitioner No.2 will be her legal guardian. w.P.(cRL) 849/2011 page I of 2 oh
2011:DHC:18770 In view of this fact that the marriage between Petitioner Nos.l and 2 is a valid legal maniage, Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 who are present in Court state that though they had filed an FIR, however they undertake not to interfere in the happy married peaceful life of the Petitioners. In view of the statement of Respondent No. 3 & 4 that they will not interfere in the lives of Petitioner
No. 1 & 2, Petitioner No. 1 & 2 state that they do not want to press the present petition.
Petition and application are dismissed as not pressed.
Order dasti.
W//,^rA-- MUKTA GUPTA.J JULY 20,20t1 'ga' w.P.(cRL) 84e/2011 psge 2 of2
2011:DHC:18770
20.07.201r Petitioners are present in person. Though the age of the Petitioner
No.1 is disputed by Respondent No.3 & 4 who are her parents who state that she is aged about 16 years 4 months at the time when she married the
Petitioner No.2. However, as per the Muslim Personal Law since the
PetitionerNo.l has attained the age of puberty she can validly consent for her marriage. Pursuant to a valid marciage, the husband of Petitioner No.1 i.e. Petitioner No.2 will be her legal guardian. w.P.(cRL) 849/2011 page I of 2 oh
2011:DHC:18770 In view of this fact that the marriage between Petitioner Nos.l and 2 is a valid legal maniage, Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 who are present in Court state that though they had filed an FIR, however they undertake not to interfere in the happy married peaceful life of the Petitioners. In view of the statement of Respondent No. 3 & 4 that they will not interfere in the lives of Petitioner
No. 1 & 2, Petitioner No. 1 & 2 state that they do not want to press the present petition.
Petition and application are dismissed as not pressed.
Order dasti.
W//,^rA-- MUKTA GUPTA.J JULY 20,20t1 'ga' w.P.(cRL) 84e/2011 psge 2 of2
2011:DHC:18770
JUDGMENT