Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of hearing: 14th July, 2011
Date of Decision: 20th July, 2011
Date of hearing: 14th July, 2011
Date of Decision: 20th July, 2011
CRL. A. 350/2011
VIJAY KUMAR TRIPATHY @ LAMBOO …...APPELLANT
Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate.
VIJAY KUMAR TRIPATHY @ LAMBOO …...APPELLANT
Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate.
VERSUS
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI …...RESPONDENT
Through: Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State.
Through: Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL
JUDGMENT
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Order? No
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No
3. Whether the Order should be reported in the Digest? No
JUDGMENT
G.P. MITTAL, J.
1. The present appeal is allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in Crl.A.No.346/2011 tilted as ‘CHANDER SHEKHAR @ SHEKHAR v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI’.
2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. Crl. M.(Bail) No.460/2011
3. This application has become infructuous and the same is accordingly dismissed.
(G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE (S. RAVINDRA BHAT)
JUDGE JULY 20, 2011 vk