Full Text
Translation output
63# $~ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 2243/2011
JASMIT SINGH &ORS. Petitioners
Through: Mr. Akshay Sahni, Advocate with Petitioners in person.
CRL.M.C. 2243/2011
JASMIT SINGH &ORS. Petitioners
Through: Mr. Akshay Sahni, Advocate with Petitioners in person.
VERSUS
STATE & ANR. Respondents
Through: Mr. Pawan Bahl, APP for the State with HC Surender Kumar and SI
Rajkumar, PS LajpatNagar, Delhi.
Mr. Nitesh Mehra and Mr. Ankur Garg, Advocates for Respondent No.2 with Respondent No. 2 in person.
Through: Mr. Pawan Bahl, APP for the State with HC Surender Kumar and SI
Rajkumar, PS LajpatNagar, Delhi.
Mr. Nitesh Mehra and Mr. Ankur Garg, Advocates for Respondent No.2 with Respondent No. 2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER o/„ 20.07.2011
CrI. M.A. 8136/2011 (Exemption)
Allowed, subjectto alljust exceptions.
Crl. M.C. No. 2243/2011 Issue notice.
LearnedAPP accepts notice on behalfof the State.
Learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent NO. 2/Complainant.
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 500/2007 under Sections
323/341/34 IPG registered atPS Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi on the complaint
ORDER o/„ 20.07.2011
CrI. M.A. 8136/2011 (Exemption)
Allowed, subjectto alljust exceptions.
Crl. M.C. No. 2243/2011 Issue notice.
LearnedAPP accepts notice on behalfof the State.
Learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent NO. 2/Complainant.
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 500/2007 under Sections
323/341/34 IPG registered atPS Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi on the complaint
CRL.M.C. 2243/2011
\ 2011:DHC:15523 of Mr. Kapil Bakshi. As per the FIR it was alleged that in the evening of
27^'' May, 2007 when theComplainant/Respondent No. 2 went to the shop to smoke cigarette, two other boys were also with him. Some days ago a quarrel was taken place between the Complainant and Respondent No. 2 on some issue. That day again there were exchange of hot arguments on the same issue pursuant thereto Jasmeet Singh attacked the Complainant with a sharp weapon due to which he sustained cut injury on his cheek and started bleeding.
The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 Mr. Kapil Bakshi is present is present in person and is identified by his counsel. He states that he has amicably settled the matter with the intervention of the friends and neighbours and he does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedingspursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no usefiil purpose will be served in continuance ofthe proceedings, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the
FIR.
\ 2011:DHC:15523 of Mr. Kapil Bakshi. As per the FIR it was alleged that in the evening of
27^'' May, 2007 when theComplainant/Respondent No. 2 went to the shop to smoke cigarette, two other boys were also with him. Some days ago a quarrel was taken place between the Complainant and Respondent No. 2 on some issue. That day again there were exchange of hot arguments on the same issue pursuant thereto Jasmeet Singh attacked the Complainant with a sharp weapon due to which he sustained cut injury on his cheek and started bleeding.
The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 Mr. Kapil Bakshi is present is present in person and is identified by his counsel. He states that he has amicably settled the matter with the intervention of the friends and neighbours and he does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedingspursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no usefiil purpose will be served in continuance ofthe proceedings, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the
FIR.
CRL.M.C. 2243/2011 Page 2 of3 n/
Consequently, FIR No. 500/2007 under Sections 323/341/34 IPC registered at PS Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition is disposedof. Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 20,2011 p^'cK'evo^
Consequently, FIR No. 500/2007 under Sections 323/341/34 IPC registered at PS Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition is disposedof. Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 20,2011 p^'cK'evo^
CRL.M.C. 2243/2011 Page 3 of3
I'
I'
JUDGMENT