13943176b91f8bcb4b7dd8f1a5ab6e0fff3a207abefea4b45d1122f19386fadd

Delhi High Court · 29 Jul 2011 · 2011:DHC:11605-DB
Vikrmajit Sen; Siddharth Mridul
FAO(OS)31-7-1B|2OL1- & CM 11881-/2OL1
2011:DHC:11605-DB
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal on payment of costs to the respondent and dismissed the appeal accordingly.

Full Text
Translation output
A-7 o/o 29.07.201L
Present: Mr Nishant Datta, Advocate, for the Appellant.
Mr Arun Khosla and Ms Shreeanka Kakkar, Advocates, '.for Respondent No.L.
Mr Ankit Jain, Advocate for Respondent No.3 alongwith
Respondent No.3 in Person.
+ FAO(OS)31-7-1B|2OL1- & CM 11881-/2OL1 (stav)
{<
After considerable hearing, Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal.
We think it proper that the Appellant should compensate or pay Costs to Respondent No.L Sulekha Karir Marwaha, who has been drawn into defending the case. Costs quantified as { 10,000/- be paid to Respondent No.L within one week.
Counsel for Respondent No.3 has tendered two cheques for the sum of T 15,000/- each in the name of Respondent No.L
Sulekha Karir bearing Nos. 694624 and 694625 dated 29.7.20t1 drawn on ABN Amro Bank N.V., Hauz Khas, New Delhi, to Counsel for Respondent No.L towards his liability for payment of License Fee
{ for the period of June 2OII and JuIy zOl"L Counsel for Respondent
No.L accepts the same.
As prayed for, Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
July 29,2OL1. nt
Pending Application also stands disposed of.
,. L v/---
VIKR1MAJIT SEN, J.
I
,4{M
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
2011:DHC:11605-DB
JUDGMENT