Full Text
Translation output
A-26
% 29.7.2011
Present: Mr.Ranjan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Sudhir Kathpalia for Ms.Suparna Srivastva, 'Advocate for respondent no.1 and 2 .
, +CONT. CAS (C) No.135/2011
* Resp6ndent no.2 is present in person in terms of the direction in the last order of this Court. It is not in dispute that
(- ' the direction contained in the order dated 12.8.2010 have now been comBlied with and the payment in terms of those directions had been ~iven to the petitioner on 31.5.2011. Record show that the SLP 'filed against the order dated 12.8.2010 had been dismissed ~nd thereafter on 08.4.2011 this Cqurt had recorded that the order dated 12.8.2010 shall now be complied with within four weeks. That period expires on 08.5.2011. Counsel for the respondents states that because of the administrative exigency and because o~ the procedural delays this payment had been effected
I
~ 22 days la;ter; there was no intent to disobey or disregard the order of this Co*rt. In view of this explanation tendered nothing survives in this coritempt petition. This petition is disposedifaccordingly
JULY 29/:2011 nandan !
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
2011:DHC:8378
% 29.7.2011
Present: Mr.Ranjan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Sudhir Kathpalia for Ms.Suparna Srivastva, 'Advocate for respondent no.1 and 2 .
, +CONT. CAS (C) No.135/2011
* Resp6ndent no.2 is present in person in terms of the direction in the last order of this Court. It is not in dispute that
(- ' the direction contained in the order dated 12.8.2010 have now been comBlied with and the payment in terms of those directions had been ~iven to the petitioner on 31.5.2011. Record show that the SLP 'filed against the order dated 12.8.2010 had been dismissed ~nd thereafter on 08.4.2011 this Cqurt had recorded that the order dated 12.8.2010 shall now be complied with within four weeks. That period expires on 08.5.2011. Counsel for the respondents states that because of the administrative exigency and because o~ the procedural delays this payment had been effected
I
~ 22 days la;ter; there was no intent to disobey or disregard the order of this Co*rt. In view of this explanation tendered nothing survives in this coritempt petition. This petition is disposedifaccordingly
JULY 29/:2011 nandan !
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
2011:DHC:8378
JUDGMENT